Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bjorn Grinde
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. dbenbenn | talk 00:57, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
vanity page --JPotter 05:33, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
- Userfy - It's got a user attached; however, the user seems to be self-promoting on the wikipedia. humblefool® 05:40, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- There is at least a claim to notability, he has published a mainstream book. The self promo is worrying, but I'm not sure if that merits deletion. No vote yet. --fvw* 06:38, 2005 Jan 31 (UTC)
- Self promotion. But using his real name Bjørn Grinde I see he has published 2 books and 80 scientific articles that are kosher enough. And his position at Folkehelseinstituttet is also real enough. So keep. -- Egil 12:46, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Move to his User page and delete. If he's notable, let somebody else write it. RickK 01:12, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, he is notable enough, published works. Megan1967 03:02, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Passes the professor test, as far as I can understand, and now that Egil has removed the adjective "famous" describing his book, it is also NPOV. Userfy if not kept. / up+land 16:47, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Individual meets and exceeds the bar of notability. GRider\talk 19:31, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not fond of vanity, but his book seems to be mildly notable, so keep. RadicalSubversiv E 08:13, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. --Viriditas | Talk 19:49, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.