User talk:Ninam~enwiki

Welcome

Hi Ninam! Welcome to Wikipedia. You seem to have found your way nicely, so I won't try to pass any further advice :) Good luck. --Joy [shallot] 13:09, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Hi Joy, thx for Welcome :) --Ninam 00:34, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC).

Images

When uploading images please always edit the image description page and do two things:

State the source of the image (created yourself, the address of a web page or another source.)
State the copyright. The easiest way to list the copyright is to use a copyright tag. The most important tags are {{GFDL}}, {{PD}}, and {{fairuse}}. GFDL is for images that you create yourself. PD is for public domain images (pre-1923 in most cases). Fair use is for copyrighted images that we can use under the fair use rules in the USA.

Without proper source and copyright information, images will eventually be deleted!

If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images (on my talk page) and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much.

In particular Image:Dusanova Srbija200.jpg needs info source and copyright. The legend should probably also be translated. Thanks — Zeimusu | Talk 06:33, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Image have been scanned from university book, before WWII, so it is in PD and convenient with propositions of Wiki. Author of that book is my grand-grand father, so in any case depends on me as hereditary of his intellectual work to give it in Public Domain. So, my work to, dedicated to understanding between international community is also in PD, so I do believe in 5th Gold Rule od Internet, which was established in the Beginning, You can bring love/ As much love you give. Best, --Ninam 23:22, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

General

Ninam, I've edited a couple of the articles that you started (for wikification, a bit of clarification, etc.). Let me know if I screwed up anything :) Anyway, this is a suggestion: can you try to keep introductory description of person's interests and activities a bit shorter? It would make them more readable and easier to understand if it were not so overwhelming. Just a friendly suggestion. --Dejan Cabrilo 02:56, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Image:Predrag Dragic.jpg

Ninam, what's the copyright status of Image:Predrag Dragic.jpg? I don't think it falls under fair use, because it doesn't illustrate Lainović's work. Also, it probably isn't the best practice to use such an abstract painting to illustrate an article about a person. Can you please tag the image with the appropriate copyright information? Please take a look at Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags and put an appropriate tag. --Dejan Cabrilo 03:06, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hi, Dejan. The drawing is in Dragic's possession, so as copyright, and I obtained it from him. In addition, it is on the cover of one of his books, in accordance with Wikipedia's copyright policy... Moreover, the usual manner and exhibit rules are - when you expose someone's painting/ drawing to give attribute to author. On style, yes with this author is appropriate to illustrate with this drawing. So, on style - Pope's State is not Vatican, sorry, and so on. Anyway, thx, for other changes. --Ninam 21:54, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Nikola Moravcevic

The issue is mainly formatting. There are also a few minor grammar mistakes. I'll work on correcting the grammar. — J3ff 06:37, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Yep, we were together on Article, so my dozens of liks to journals vanished. Thank you for grammar, I am going to sleep now, and the first thing in the morning to make those awful liknks correct. --Ninam 07:00, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Deadend

Sorry you caught me in the middle of a major update to the page so I overwrote your edit. I have gone through and redone most of your edits. One exception is Nenad Prokic it still does not match standard formatting, it does not even have any full sentences. - SimonP 02:48, May 25, 2005 (UTC)

Mysterious disappearing nunneries of Mt. Athos!

You wrote: "yep, there is no "nunneries" on Mt. Athos, only Ascetic nuns (houses of ascetisam)".

Not a grammar mistake, my ignorance. sorry Muj0 20:53, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Weird Al Yankovic / Serbian Diaspora ?

Er, I'm not certain why you've added Weird Al to this 'Serbian Diaspora' category you've created. Weird Al is American, not Serbian and as far as I know lives in the USA. Care to shed some light here? Djbrianuk 01:28, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yep, he is descent of Serbian parents, Nick(Serbian:Nikola) and Mary (Serbian:Marija/read:Mari(y)a //in Serbian you can hear y after i) Yankovic/ Serbian:Janković/ read: Yankovich, so he is Serbian origin, i.e. Serbian diaspora. --Ninam 02:00, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
PS Correction on mother side:
What nationality is Al?
Al's grandparents on his father's side were Yugoslavian, and on his mother's side they were Italian and English. Offical site
NB In exYugoslavia there is no other surnames wich ends on -vic /(Serbian: -vić) but Serbian.

What about Fadila Memišević, AM, from Radio Free Europe? ;) --VKokielov 03:03, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nikolai Velimirovic

I fixed the link to Alexander Schmemann, but I couldn't figure out what you meant by "archbishop Brussels-Changhai Jovan" — perhaps you could fix whatever typo there may have been. --Magda 23:27, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Do you think it should be John (Maximovitch) of Shanghai and San Francisco? I did look back as best I could to find that you had added the information back in April, before the issue of whether to include the information came up at all. Perhaps you could cite the sources for the quotations somewhere? Humbly yours, Magda 15:13, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian portal

As the amount of material somehow connected with Serbs and Serbia on Wikipedia grows, I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to form a SCG/Serb portal, so that all the articles about famous Serbs, Serb history, the Serb republic etc are more closely interlinked. This would also provide the casual reader with a easy to use encyclopaedia of everything they could wish to know about RS, SCG, the Serb diaspora etc. Јес' да је Србија мала и да је мало Срба али ипак има Палестински портал, Doctor Who портал, зато нема разлога да и ми ово не покренемо. At this stage I'm just gauging the amount of interest out there for this. If you support this idea, and want to help out, then just drop by my talk page -- estavisti 20:02, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

a Karadjordjevic

Could you kindly explain, why you have regarded the article about Dim. of yugosl. as deletable, and even as bad as "speedy deletion"?

I was not able to find any written reason from you to justify your proposition. Not the speedy, nor any sort of deletion.

Could you kindly explain why you, rather insultingly, called "nonsense" the fact that he is son of Alexander of Yugoslavia. (He of course is, and no one in any place in genealogy in the talk page has claimed that the said Alexander be crown prince - actually, the genealogies in the talk page state very clearly that he is son of that Alexander who is son of Paul and Olga, and thus it is self-evident to everyone who knows anything about that crown prince that he is not Dimitri's father - as all such people know that HIS parents were Peter and Alexandra.)

In my opinion, it is an interesting thing that despite odds against it (such as centuries of foreign rule, and persecution, and tendency to sink into oblivion as centuries go), a Yugoslavian prince actually verifiably descends from medieval monarchs of the same area as well as from Scanderbeg./And, why cannot Wikipedia give such information - as it is undeniably information. 62.78.104.95 07:22, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anonym, I am sorry, it was my mistake, (Prince Alexander of Yugoslavia =not= Crown Prince Alexander of Yugoslavia). Please take my humbly apologies. --Ninam 22:05, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian diaspora

Ninam, I just noticed that you added several articles to category "Serbian diaspora". However, in the English language, word diaspora is usually used to refer to people who form some kind of an expatriate community, preserving a lot of culture, etc. (see diaspora) I don't think that people like Milo Radulovich or "Weird Al" Yankovic fit that category. --Dejan Čabrilo 17:04, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

On diacritics

I'm not sure what you have in mind regarding "remov[ing] ASCII in LINKS in spite of new version of Wiki sfw". Basically what I did was take, for example, Slobodan Milošević and systematically check all the pages referencing the Slobodan Milosevic redirect. Where the diacritics were missing I added them. I also changed [[Slobodan Milosevic|Slobodan Milošević]], strictly speaking without need, simply because on What links here these references show up as pointing to the redirect and look like instances without diacritics that need fixing.

"Those names should be found in search engines, in ANY language, no matter of user's knowledge of Serbian diacritics or not." I don't understand your argument. Surely you don't suggest that the text of the page Slobodan Milošević should contain popular misspellings Milosevic, Milosevich, Milosovic, etc, to help people find the page in a search engine? And if this doesn't apply to the principal page, why should it apply to other articles referencing it? Besides, Google at least treats characters with diacritics and the plain base character as synonymous for searches.

—Naddy 17:17, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian culture

I have had a go at improving this article. So far, I have added sections on literature, music, art, theatre and cinema. I hope to add other material in following days but may not have the article completed by the close of the vote. I would be grateful if you could have a look at it especially given your background as a Serbian. Capitalistroadster 06:36, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User Categorization

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Serbia and Montenegro page as living in or being associated with Serbia and Montenegro. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Serbia and Montenegro for instructions. -Alekk 23:11, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RS

Hi. There is a revert war going on Republika Srpska article. Would you please come to Talk:Republika_Srpska#Latest_POV_problems to check the discussion and give your opinion? Nikola 17:59, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Serbia and Montegro articles

Hi, I see you're in the category for those Wikipedians from Serbia & Montenegro. I'm trying to create a project whereby seperate articles for just Serbia OR Montenegro are written to an acceptable level, especially considering the possibility that 2006 may see the two nations seperate and become independent states. If that were to occur Wikipedia should have articles written to the standard of other national articles. It would be useful to have the input of Wikipedians living in the area. Please post any views here, not at my talk page. Thank You Grunners 18:24, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Biljana-plav.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Biljana-plav.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nicke L 16:00, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RAreiss.gif

Hi!

I am fielding an inquiry about this image. Do you happen to know where you got the image, and is it possible to get a very high resolution scan of the image? - Amgine 17:49, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Improvement Belgrade

You may wish to vote for Belgrade at the Article Improvement Drive page, here. --estavisti 21:47, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello! I invite you to join the WikiProject Serbia. All the best, --serbiana - talk 02:43, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:RAreiss.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:RAreiss.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 16:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:HRHPrincess Olga.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HRHPrincess Olga.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Durin 17:03, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Nemanja.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nemanja.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I remember you once edited Duklja. How do you like it now? Also check out Pagania. --PaxEquilibrium 21:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Slobodan Rakitic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Slobodan Rakitic.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 16:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Studenica_monastery_w.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Studenica_monastery_w.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zdravo, Nina...

Htela sam da uplaodujem sliku: Image:Dusanova Srbija200.jpg na Commons, jer na španskoj vikipediji se mogu koristiti samo slike sa Commons, međutim, nedostaju mi neki važni podaci da bi slika mogla da bude korišćena, kao na primer: The creator and year of publication are essential information and must be provided.

Kako sam videla da si je ti uploadovala na engl. Viki, kontaktiram tebe, kako bi mi (ako znaš, naravno) rekla ove podatke... Molim te, odgovori mi na mojoj stranici na španskoj Viki (stavila sam vikiveze sa strane, kao u svakom drugom članku). Hvala ti unapred. --Maduixa 10:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Batic Vladan.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Batic Vladan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Dusan Kovacevic w.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dusan Kovacevic w.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Jocic.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Jocic.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:HRHPrincess_Jelisaveta.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:HRHPrincess_Jelisaveta.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 11:24, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Devic 23-03-2004.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Devic 23-03-2004.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chris B • talk • contribs 21:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mateja Matejic w.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Mateja Matejic w.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Ministar_vojislav_vukcevic.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Ministar_vojislav_vukcevic.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 19:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ninam! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 7 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Nenad Petrović (writer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Mihailo Đurić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ljiljana Crepajac - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nikola Moravčević - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 15:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:MatejBan Ninoslav.gif

Thank you for uploading File:MatejBan Ninoslav.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:22, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:22, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:VladimmirCorovic w.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:VladimmirCorovic w.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:38, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Hanjar div Himmler Sauberzw.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hanjar div Himmler Sauberzw.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Radomir Putnik.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Radomir Putnik.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Ninam. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Ninam~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

16:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Nenad V Petrovic.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Nenad V Petrovic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mihailo Djuric w.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mihailo Djuric w.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:16, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Letter of love.jpg

The file File:Letter of love.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned text image.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 05:04, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:MilanBudimir 67 w.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:MilanBudimir 67 w.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 10:57, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Knjaz Milos Obrenovic.jpg

The file File:Knjaz Milos Obrenovic.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]