User talk:Andrewspencer
Have re-edited the article and placed sources of information regarding each of the claims made in the article. Edit some of the bias towards Dzogchen out.
cluetrain
[edit]Would you like to help me clean up The Cluetrain Manifesto? I merged the website page the cluetrain manifesto with the concept page cluetrain into a new book page The Cluetrain Manifesto. I've read the website (a couple of years ago), but not the book. Uncle Ed 14:36, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
Cluetrain Help
[edit]Yes would be good to get some help here. I have been involved in other pages and have not noticed what has been happening here. Thanks. --andyman 09:20, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
NetSuite
[edit]Hi, can you please comment on the NetSuite talk page. User:Sleepnoremore is stating incorrectly that I have added the section about 24SevenOffice. --Sleepyhead81 15:08, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
Sockpuppets
[edit]Sleepyhead, please do not enlist the help of sockpuppets on this issue. This only shows that you did in fact enlist other's help to market your product on Wikipedia in the first place. - Sleepnomore 16:17, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
NetSuite
[edit]This article still has NPOV issues. "The very way in which NetSuite pulls everything together for your business into the one platform could be seen to be a high risk -- what if the platform goes down, is attacked, or the company running the services is bankrupted?" is one of the most blatant examples. It needs a bunch of work. Reading the article more closely, it seems to be attacking NetSuite more than advertising for them. I know that you have battled over this article in the past and removed an {{NPOV}} tag before, but I am putting one back in. NPOV doesn't mean including strong opinions for and strong opinions against, it means providing neutral information. —WAvegetarian•CONTRIBUTIONSTALK• EMAIL• 10:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
VisionGateway, Inc.
[edit]A tag has been placed on VisionGateway, Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 04:36, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
I possibly didn't flesh this out enough before entering this on the site. andyman 02:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
oppose
[edit]Hi, If you really meant to vote"oppose" in the poll Wikipedia:Attribution/Poll, you put your vote in the wrong column! Mention this to anyone else whose vote looks displaced. linas 05:24, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
NetSuite
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article NetSuite, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of NetSuite. --Craw-daddy | T | 00:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
ETelemetry, Inc.
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article ETelemetry, Inc., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of ETelemetry, Inc.. --- tqbf 02:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:NetSuite Logo.PNG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:NetSuite Logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:NetSuite Logo.PNG
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:NetSuite Logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 2 October 2021 (UTC)