Talk:Qom province
 | Copyright examination was requested regarding subject described below. Sadly copyright examinations is not the right place for the request. The most common reason is that the content has already been added/uploaded to Wikipedia. Such cases (violations or not) are taken care of at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. The request has been moved to List of rejected requests. Please move the request to a better location so it can be taken care of. When the request is moved and/or backed up, please remove this template and the entry from copyright examinations page. |
Untitled
[edit]"History" in this article might be copy vio from [1].
- History content was added at version March 2005 (diff[2])
- Website above exists in Internet Archive of November 2004 [3]
This content is not much the same word-by-word, but is almost the same. Especially, using Islamic Calender, and Hazrat Ma'soomeh "(AS)" is characteristic. -Kotoito 15:00, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
Dates and numbers in this article
[edit]Wikipedia policy is clear on the use of Eras in articles:
- Both the BCE/CE era names and the BC/AD era names are acceptable, but be consistent within an article. Normally you should use plain numbers for years in the Common Era, but when events span the start of the Common Era, use AD or CE for the date at the end of the range (note that AD precedes the date and CE follows it). For example, 1 BC–AD 1 or 1 BCE–1 CE.
It is up to the author(s) of an article to determine the dating system to be used and there must be consistency with each article. In this case, for a non-Christian topic in a non-Christian region of the world, BCE/CE appears to make the most sense. Sunray 18:08, 2005 May 22 (UTC)
User: Zereshk, one of the authors of this article has indicated a strong preference for BCE/CE (see Talk: List of kings of Persia. Therefore I am reverting to BCE pending comment from other authors. Sunray 07:03, 2005 May 23 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Qom Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130531210834/http://www.amar.org.ir/Portals/1/Iran/90.pdf to http://www.amar.org.ir/Portals/1/Iran/90.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
{{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Alborz Province which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:50, 25 January 2022 (UTC)