Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thom

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge with Thomas. Has already been done, so I'm just closing here. Sjakkalle 11:13, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thom

It is a generic name, 501 articles show up on a search with about 20-30 having Thom in the title.

~~wsloand

Merge with Tom or Thomas (more likely the latter), put a line in that disambig noting that the names likely derive from the same root. -- BD2412 ^talk 00:41, 2005 May 22 (UTC)
Merge per BD2412 works for me. — RJH 18:40, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Thomas sounds like a good plan. WoodenTaco 21:55, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.