Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoggoth

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Joyous 18:30, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)

Shoggoth

The article reads like a bad advertisement, and frankly, the NPOV policy of wikipedia must be carried out. --Iconoclast 06:59, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

keep and cleanup. Iconoclast, what are you trying to prove? -leigh (φθόγγος) 07:51, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
Definitely keep. This article is fine. Rick K 07:54, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
Keep shoggoth. Delete troll. —Korath (Talk) 10:04, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Short be perfectly acceptable. Mgm|^(talk) 10:19, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Cthulhu fhtagn. Notable, and I don't see any NPOV problems. I'm not one to throw around accusations of trolling but... Khanartist 10:54, 2005 Jan 17 (UTC)
Keep point one: I'm not seeing the NPOV here, could you be more specific? Point two: NPOV by itself is not reason for deletion, it's reason for cleanup. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:44, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
Delete not notable.Baxter0 17:44, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Speedy Keep. Bad faith VfD nomination. Iconoclast is vandalising Wikipedia to make a point, or maybe simply as a prank. See Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/American_Nihilist_Underground_Society. Uncle G 21:56, 2005 Jan 17 (UTC)
Keep and cleanup. The article needs some sprucing up, but I think its noteworthy enough to be on wiki. ScottM 23:28, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep, cleanup and expand. Megan1967 00:37, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Speedy Delete, this is in no way a notable entry and should be removed. BlackCountess 06:10, 18 Jan 2005
- The above by anon 205.241.44.90. It was, predictably, its first edit. —Korath (Talk) 05:38, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC) (BlackCountess had none at the time of writing. —Korath (Talk) 08:21, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC))
  - It should also be pointed out that notability or lack thereof is not a criterion for speedy deletion. Kappa 11:08, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Strong keep; we have them in the woods around my house. -- Smerdis of Tlön 20:31, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Any chance of a snapshot? That would round the article out nicely. Kappa 00:20, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep -- Curps 22:50, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Classic Cthulhu mythos. Axl 11:55, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Part of Cthulhu mythos. —Lowellian (talk) 07:18, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
'Keep, and remember: don't feed the trolls or the Shoggoth, please. hfool/Roast me 01:40, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete cthulhuclutht. -- Hoary 07:21, 2005 Jan 22 (UTC)
Keep. I don't understand what do you mean, Iconoclast. -- Korodzik
Delete See Shuggoth; Lovecraftian invention should keep Lovecraft's spelling. [This vote by Zosodada, who forgot to sign. jni 16:43, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)]
Keep. What is this supposed to be advertising, and how is it POV? Bryan 22:10, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.