Talk:Transformer (Lou Reed album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music Start‑class High‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reviews

List of reviews for future reference:

Rolling Stone (1/4/73, p.61) - "..Lou Reed is probably a genius..Real good stuff..."Walk On The Wild Side" is another winner.."

Rolling Stone (3/28/02, p.72) - 4.5 stars out of 5 - "...One of the all-time great fake Bowie albums....A glam manifesto as outrageous as Lou Reed himself..."

Q (1/03, p.56) - Included in Q Magazine's "100 Greatest Albums Ever"

Q (5/92, p.103) - 3 Stars - Good - "..bright and sassy.."

Mojo (1/03, p.106) - "...TRANSFORMER boasts four stone classics..."

NME (10/2/93, p.29) - Ranked #55 in NME's list of the `Greatest Albums Of All Time.'

Fair use rationale for Image:Loureedtransformer.jpeg

Image:Loureedtransformer.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction Warning Box

Hi, I noticed this page had a warning box that the introduction contained most of the information. I've created some extra sections for the main article, based around other pages on albums, relocated parts of the introduction to these sections, and will remove the warning box.Ethdhelwen (talk) 13:40, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing

The track listing appears to be for a vinyl album because it has side one and side two, the some of the times differ from the album I purchased new in 1972. My copy was purchased in the US in case that may be the reason for the difference. I am going to change it to the times published on the album. I would be interested to know the source for the current times. Thanks, 72Dino (talk) 17:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mine (off Australian cassette) substitutes Goodnight Ladies for Perfect Day, so ends with Perfect Day on side two. Anyone else have this? MartinSFSA (talk) 09:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources on lyrics and writing?

Does anyone have good known sources of info on the writing (music and lyrics) of the record? Looking to build a section on that out. Tactical Fiend (talk) 15:19, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]