Jump to content

Talk:Geography of North Macedonia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeGeography of North Macedonia was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 10, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed

Comment

[edit]

GEOGRAPHY OF FYROM IS NOT GEOGRAPHY OF MACEDONIA !!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.47.35.16 (talk) 09:24, 22 December 2002 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain this? -- JeLuF 10:15 Dec 22, 2002 (UTC)

DAS IST Elementare Sache! 1+1=2! COUD YOU EXPLAIN THIS ?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.47.35.16 (talk) 11:03, 22 December 2002 (UTC)[reply]

1+1=2 is not elementary. 1+1=0 also results in a contradiction-free abelian group. 1+1=2 is an axiom, a useful convention.
As far as I understand it, FYROM is the name the UN uses for naming Macedonia. The Greeks don't like the name Macedonia since they have a region named Macedonia already. Is this wrong? -- JeLuF — Preceding undated comment added 12:10, 22 December 2002‎
PS: Could you please avoid shouting?

See FYROM and Macedonia— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.47.34.231 (talk) 12:19, 22 December 2002 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much what I said above. So what do you propose? Would Geography of the Former Yougoslav Republic of Macedonia be better?— Preceding unsigned comment added by JeLuF (talk • contribs) 12:33, 22 December 2002 (UTC)[reply]

JES!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.47.34.231 (talk • contribs) 14:02, 22 December 2002 (UTC)[reply]

Our anon user is correct - Macedonia and the FYROM are not the same thing. I've moved the page accordingly. --Camembert — Preceding undated comment added 14:09, 22 December 2002‎

POLL: Introduction for Republic of Macedonia article

[edit]

Given ongoing discussions and recent edit warring, a poll is currently underway to decide the rendition of the lead for the Republic of Macedonia article. Please weigh in! E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 01:04, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Geography of the Republic of Macedonia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reading through the article, it is close to being a GA, but has a few obvious things than need fixing or cleaning up.

  • The first thing that I noticed is that the references need tidying up a bit. One gives the date retrieved, and the rest don't. Some are simply the link. They should all be the same style really. See Wikipedia:Citing_sources#How_to_present_citations. Sources are one of the most important things in an article so this should really be cleaned up. Also always make sure that the reference number comes after the punctuation, for example "The boundary with Albania that is long 151 km was marked first in 1926 and then remarked with the Treaty of Paris in 1947[10]." should be corrected.
  • The table in topography seems to break the article up a bit unnecessarily. Is there any other way this could be presented?
  • The images on the article are good and illustrate the topic well. However, none of the images have alt text. "Alt text is meant for readers who cannot see the image. It summarizes the image's appearance, not its meaning, and typically has little in common with the caption."
  • The article links to 6 different disambiguation pages:
  • Also links to Climate of the Republic of Macedonia (redirects back to this article)
  • Ref 21 is a dead link.[1]
  • At the end of Geography_of_the_Republic_of_Macedonia#Characteristics_and_advantages, "Macedonia Timeless are a series of few videos, financed by". Is this necessary to the article? And it makes no sense as the ending seems to have gone astray.
  • Some of the English is poor, such as "However the rate of unemployment decreased in 2009 on 30%", and although minor, should be fixed if it's going to be GA.
  • Some facts are completely unsourced, and should really have a source or external link to prove them.
This is just a short list of things that need to be fixed. For each point raised, there is probably another issue similar in the article. Read through the article thoroughly and check everything is up to good article standard. If you are stuck with any of the English, do not hesitate to ask me!

Reviewer: -- bydand•talk 07:48, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the six links to disambiguation pages, removed the link to Climate of the Republic of Macedonia, removed the dead link and the statement it supported, removed the unfinished and unnecessary sentence at the end of the Characteristics and advantages section, added alt text for all of the images, and moved punctuation before the reference numbers where it was needed. I also fixed some of the English. I'm not sure, however, what to do with the table in the topography section. --Local hero talk 19:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I made a special template with the biggest mountains in the Republic of Macedonia that is currently used in that article. We can use it hear too. I will put it instead the table so maybe the look of the article will change on better. Greetings Tomica1111 (talk) 23:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)1111tomica[reply]
It looks like all that needs to dealt with from the list above is adding references to unsourced statements and fixing up some of the English. --Local hero talk 17:39, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's the status on this review? It's been over a month without any comments on either side. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:43, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reviewer seems to have disappeared so I'll do a second review shortly. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:51, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found in the lead, box, and Climate section:

  • The infobox confuses me; "% land †% water" I would think numbers are supposed to be there?
  • "The southern border is also only about sixty miles from the Aegean Sea" Okay, but I don't get what this has to do with the climate; that's not explained.
  • "Winters are characteristic for their coldness, wetness and the snow falls very often." the tense and subject jumps mid sentence to me; can the snow part be tweaked/reworded?
  • "The average annual temperature of air is 11.5 °C, but the plains are experiencing a higher temperature, 15 °C." fix tense (experience instead of are experiencing.
  • "The warmest month is July, which has an average of 22.2 °C and the coldest is January, with a temperature of 0.3 °C." use "average temperature" on both parts rather than just one word.
  • "till now" ick, remove.
  • "This region is experiencing more of warmer winters through vardarec, wind coming up the river from its mouth and brings warm air." huh? I think "vardarec wind" is a term in itself, so the comma is definitely out of place. This sentence in general needs rewording though.
  • "Skopje, low-lying city, has an average of 64 rainy days per year, the month of October is the wettest with 61 mm, the driest is August with 28 mm" Skopje should be linked, and there should be an "and" before the driest.

I'll give you a few days to fix these up, most likely. Tomorrow I'll review the rest of the article and decide whether to put this on hold or just flat-out fail it, because the prose and grammar has not been good so far. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:23, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here are more issues I found:

  • "The country has some 748 km of boundaries," some isn't really needed, I'm sure there's an exact number to be found.
  • "Rather more than half of the boundary" huh?
  • "The east border with Bulgaria has length" a length
  • "The region is seismically active and has been the site of destructive earthquakes in the past, most recently in 1963 when Skopje was heavily damaged by a major earthquake, killing over 1,000." citation needed.
  • "and that Black Sea basin." the Black
  • The River Vardar section and the section above are a slew of one or two sentence paragraphs that don't really create a cohesive section. Beyond that, most of it is uncited.
  • Lake Ohrid is uncited, as is Lake Prespa.

Just from reading through this much, I can tell that this article still needs a lot of work yet, so I'm failing the GA. After the above is finished, I would suggest taking it to WP:PR before trying GAN again. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:20, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Geography of the Republic of Macedonia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Geography of the Republic of Macedonia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Geography of the Republic of Macedonia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geography of North Macedonia

[edit]

The geography of North Macedonia is an article about the geography of the country called North Macedonia that encompasses the northern part of the geographical region of Macedonia i.e. the ajective in this context should be North Macedonian: forests, lakes etc., not simply Macedonian, which has broader meaning. Jingiby (talk) 15:27, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read #4 here under "detailed consensus". There is no consensus for non-state adjectives where there is no ambiguity, so we defer to stable wording until otherwise agreed upon. --Local hero talk 15:31, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"State-related" is a bit ill-defined. Having participated in the original discussion, I remember the spirit behind it being "things about the country/state of North Macedonia" as opposed to "things related to the Slavic Macedonian ethnic group and culture". When compiling reliable source references, forests, mountains, roads, etc., were put in the "state-related" category. --Antondimak (talk) 09:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jingiby You are not the only victim of the North Macedonian obsession. I agree that we should use North Macedonian in the cases you report. It's really crazy how some specific people try to misinterpret WP:MOSMAC for their own interests and they block the improvement of this project. Ο Ροζ Πάνθηρας

Nomination for deletion of "Template:Largest cities of North Macedonia"

[edit]

Template:Largest cities of North Macedonia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 11:24, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

, North Macedonia's side, leads to cumbersome text

[edit]

The sentence The biggest island in the Great Prespa Lake, on North Macedonia's side, is called Golem Grad ("Large Fortress"), or Snake Island (Змиски Остров). is hard to read and I changed it to The largest island on the North Macedonian side of the lake is called Golem Grad ("Large Fortress"), or Snake Island (Змиски Остров)., which sounds more natural to me, and Antondimak seems to agree according to the last edit. Jingiby has also expressed this opinion above and he was blocked by a specific user who blocks me as well. I would like to have the opinion of more users here. Ο Ροζ Πάνθηρας Ο Ροζ Πάνθηρας 08:09, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

"The largest island on the North Macedonian side of the lake" implies that there are larger islands on other "sides", which there are not. The "side" wording should probably be revised though, islands aren't on sides, they're in the lake itself. "Biggest" is also an odd choice, given there are only two. CMD (talk) 09:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Reading it quickly I also accidentally read "Albania" as "Albanian", because of its position inside the parenthesis next to the name. How about "It has two islands, the bigger of which is called Golem Grad ("Large Fortress"), or Snake Island (Змиски Остров), and is located on the North Macedonian part of the lake. The other island, Mal Grad ("Small Fortress"), is on the Albanian part, and is the site of a ruined 14th century monastery dedicated to St. Peter."? --Antondimak (talk) 10:01, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that Ο Ροζ Πάνθηρας's version sounds more natural. I won't oppose any version which is unambiguous and in accordance to the guidelines. I will however add that it's tiring to go through all this hassle every time somebody tries to improve an article related to North Macedonia. --Antondimak (talk) 09:52, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The sentence of Antondimak looks good to me. If we want to be pedantic, I think the word larg(er) is more suitable than big(ger), and the passive voice is located may be replaced by the active voice lies.
For example, It has two islands, the larger of which is called Golem Grad ("Large Fortress"), or Snake Island (Змиски Остров), and lies on the North Macedonian part of the lake. The other island, Mal Grad ("Small Fortress"), lies on the Albanian part and is the site of a ruined 14th century monastery dedicated to St. Peter. Ο Ροζ Πάνθηρας(talk)
I agree with this version. --Antondimak (talk) 20:51, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why use all the extra words? It has two islands, the larger of which is called Golem Grad ("Large Fortress"), or Snake Island (Змиски Остров), and lies in North Macedonia. The other island, Mal Grad ("Small Fortress"), lies in Albania and is the site of a ruined 14th century monastery dedicated to St. Peter. --Local hero talk 00:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why discuss the Albanian island at all? Establish that the text only talks about the portion within North Macedonia, and you don't need to specify countries. CMD (talk) 00:40, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fair point, I've just edited the text accordingly. --Local hero talk 02:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This version seems a bit confusing to me. It's literally correct, but, assuming that the average reader has no knowledge of the matter beforehand, which is how Wikipedia should be written, I don't think it's easily read by someone skimming through. That's just my opinion though, nothing subjective. --Antondimak (talk) 10:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps we re-wrote the sentence as many times as necessary to avoid North Macedonian until we completely broke the sentence. We succeeded in limiting the english language in favour of nationalism. Ο Ροζ Πάνθηρας(talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:22, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't say it's broken, just subjectively slightly more confusing. --Antondimak (talk) 21:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Geography_of_North_Macedonia&oldid=1202251538"