User talk:Danutz

Romania

There should be some articles about Romania, that are not to find in the English Wikipedia. Please see Gutza's talk page on the Romanian Wikipedia --Danutz 9 Dec 2003 21:00 (UTC)

Yes, I've seen the list. I already took on the article on the Romanian Constitution & I just finished the one on Henri Coandă. I'll plow through the others later this month; I'm doing some work on some Seattle material next. -- Jmabel 08:16, 10 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Unverified image

Thanks for uploading the image

Image:Ursus.jpg

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the image and I'll tag it for you. Thanks, Kbh3rd 03:47, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Image:BRD Cluj small.gif

Can you transcode your better copy to PNG format and then upload it to the commons? Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 03:25, May 27, 2005 (UTC)

I don´t have any program to do so, but so far I know jpeg is the best format for pictures (not graphics). The big version one can find at ro:Imagine:BRD_Cluj.gif (actually http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ro/c/c1/BRD_Cluj.gif ). --Danutz 11:54, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Danutz Danutz cel harnicut :)

Danutz cel harnicut, sa nu cedezi! esti foarte tare! --168.167.253.97 13:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oops

Sorry about that IP business, you can ask a user such as Jayjg or someone else that has oversight capabilities to remove the edit if you want. La revedere. —Khoi khoi 22:29, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

Perhaps I should create template "Hungarian speaking states" and list Transylvania in it? Yet, there are much more Hungarians in Transylvania than Romanians in Vojvodina. What you think about that? PANONIAN (talk) 23:48, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"But Hungarian is not official in Romania at any level"

O, yes it is, it is quite official, see: Hungarian Autonomous Province. Quote: "The Romanian law enables the usage of the language of an ethnic minority which forms at least 20% of the population of a municipality in relation with the administration, and the state provides education and public signage in the language of the respective ethnic minority." You see that Hungarian is official in Transylvania on local level and you also can see that infoboxes of the cities of Transylvania with more than 20% Hungarians have also Hungarian names in it: Târgu-Mureş, Oradea, etc. So, I ask you again: should we create the template I proposed. There are two more problems: 1. Vojvodina have 6 official languages and you cannot post such template ONLY for Romanian language. It is nothing but POV pushing. If you create templates for ALL SIX languages of Vojvodina then we could at least start a seriuos discussion about this. 2. Romanian is not official in Moldova, so template is totally wrong. PANONIAN (talk) 12:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Danutz:

1. You did not answered my argument about EQUALITY of official languages of Vojvodina. A simple question: why you insist that Romanian is MORE EQUAL than other? If you continue your POV pushing, you will force me to create same templates for other 5 official languages (Serbian speaking states, Hungarian speaking states, Slovak speaking states, etc).
2. If I create these new templates, the Hungarian speaking states template will definitelly contain Transylvania. It is really not important whether Hungarian is official in Transylvania or not. There is no rule that such templates should contain only territories where language is official. They could contain territories where language is spoken too. See this as an example: Celtic nations. You see that Brittany and Cornwall and listed as Celtic nations, no matter that Celtic languages ARE NOT OFFICIAL there. If Brittany and Cornwall are listed as Celtic nations, then by all mean we could list Transylvania as Hungarian nation. There is no single difference here. PANONIAN (talk) 12:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I totaly agree that such templates should be created, but you should list Romania not Transilvanya as Transylvania only exists as a historical region. And you should say states with significant Hungarian minorities (because "Hungarian-speaking is missleading as you said"). Maybe the problem actualy was that the template said Romanian-speakins states, it should say states (teritories) that have Romanian as an official language. I think that should sound better. --Danutz

Well, then, since there is nothing implying that "territory" as a concept in your template relies on international recognition, then please clarify by turning it into "internationally-recognized territories" (as you have been kind enough to add such specifications to the template before). Of course, some specification is needed for "organizations" as well, but I'm sure you will add that as well in due time. Dahn 13:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, states are. Territories are not. And, if there is a single organization involved, the "organizations" part is a misnomer... The template serves no purpose. The template is vague. The template relies on what you had in mind when you created it. The template is minuscule. Frankly, the only way in which it may stand for something is if you rename it to "A template that includes Romania, Moldova, Vojvodina, and the Latin League" - of course, this just before it gets deleted. Dahn 13:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually a template that lists places where Romanian is official. --Danutz

No. Because it is not official in Moldova. Dahn 13:55, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nu prea, prietene. Pentru că interpretarea unei legi nu este legea însăşi. Pe de altă parte, mi se pare elocvent că o persoană care adresează injurii "din glumă" a putut ajunge administrator pe wikipedia română. La revedere. Dahn 14:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nu prietene, nimeni nu e prieten cu tine. Esti o minoritate ratata si izolata. Esti izolat. La revedere pentru tine. De altfel orice anti-roman va avea aceeasi soarta. Era cazul sa avem admini romani nu anti-romani ca tine. Sau numai cei ca tine pot fi buni? du-te si pupa-l in cur pe Coicoiul tau sau pe mikkalaievici. Tradator de neam si de tara, esti un ratat! --168.167.253.97 14:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Totuşi fără atacuri de genul acesta, sunt destul de urâte (minoritate ratata si izolata). Lăsând gluma şi injuriile la o parte toţi încercăm să facem din conţinutul Wikipediei unul mai bun şi ar trebui să existe un minim de respect între noi. Şi cam depăşim limita cu calificative din acestea. --Danutz

It's good that you lecture me on common efforts and collaboration after you have speculated about how I am "anti-Romanian" because somebody must have beaten me during childhood. It is a valuable lesson I am learning about the "the minimal respect" from you, after you have implied that I am "decayed", and that, by way of consequence, you "allow yourself these jokes with me". Did I allow them, or does this not fall within the scope of "minimal respect"? Yes, we are indeed crossing a line just now, after you, an administrator on ro:wiki, have allowed a cascade of personal attacks aimed at me and voiced on your talk page over there: Bonaparte crosses the line now that he tells me to kiss user:Khoikhoi's or user:Mikkalai's ass, but he sure did not cross it when he called me "stupid", "illiterate", "failure", "mutt", "coward", and "two-timer" on that very page.

I do not contribute to wikipedia in order to generate scandals, and I gather no pleasure from getting myself involved in disputes such as this one. I have been active in removing the Moldovenist POV on the Moldova page, as well as on the Moldovans one. You have heard a version of what I do here as rendered by a person who has dragged my name through mud on several pages; you have chosen to believe it, without checking the facts: that, I cannot ever respect. You back a template which is, IMO, both useless and POV; when I have argued my opinion, you have joined others in calling me "anti-Romanian", without having presented any semblance of proof for what is otherwise a very serious accusation (albeit one which has been thrown around so many times by now that it must carry no more meaning). Instead of asking other Romanian users why they erase your template from articles where you post it, you could ask them about my contributions and the compromise that was reached on several pages involved in this dispute.

Thank you for your time. That is indeed all. Dahn 15:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Logo_Latin_Union.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo_Latin_Union.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECU≈talk 02:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About TAROM destinations

Hi, Danutz. About the TAROM destination OTP-CLJ... According to the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Airlines a flight should be listed just once; imagine how the article would look if someone would add all the return flights to OTP... Cristibur 14:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Romanians in Vojvodina

I moveprotected the article. Protection is not endorsement of current title . I don't intend to take sides further, but the article has a talk page. I had to delete your copy-paste move, because it screwed the edit history per WP:CPMV. Duja► 11:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Localizare.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Localizare.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Fibonacci 19:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Hi, sorry but I'll replace that image again with the Italian/Linux one. No slight against Romanian intended, believe me. It's just that a screenshot of Windows programs is not free of copyright, whereas a screenshot of Linux is free, so we must use that instead. Image policies. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use rationale for Image:Logo Uniunea Latina.gif
[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Logo Uniunea Latina.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use rationale for Image:Steag Unilat.png
[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Steag Unilat.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 16:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use rationale for Image:Logo Uniunea Latina.gif
[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Logo Uniunea Latina.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 16:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use rationale for Image:Libertatea Voivodina electronic.png
[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Libertatea Voivodina electronic.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 16:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

This should be clear to you by now

The admin that you are should be able to understand that a person would demean himself/herself by even taking into consideration a message containing a sentence like the one you introduced yours with. Should be, but you manifestly aren't. So consider this my final attempt to make you aware of that. Feel free to erase this message as I did to yours, but make sure you note that the next time you insult me I'll bring it up a notch and present your paradox to AN/I. Have a good day, and say hello to your friend Bonaparte from me. Dahn 10:18, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bla-bla.. Bonaparte talk & contribs

I'm not playing this game. I sincerely doubt that, as an admin on ro:wiki, you don't know what WP:NPA is by now. If you honestly don't know, then... well, let's just say the obvious mediocrity of ro:wiki has found its rational explanation. Dahn 10:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1. What part of the sources allows you to rephrase the text already in the article? Especially when you replace it with bewildering sentences such as "This however, does not mean that Serbian government have official position whether Vlach and Romanian are separate languages" and the word "finaly" (which is both not in English and POV) 2. What does the official law say? I don't see a direct quote, merely paraphrases, and this is a problem of definition (i.e. "the term used", not "the term deduced") 3. No, I do not particularly care what [other] languages you claim to speak, I just care about maintaining a basic standard of orthography and grammar. 4. I would take the "blog" argument from someone who does not go around filling pages with POV and samples of his personal art. But the fact that you brought it up is probably indicative that you realized what is and isn't condoned/expected, so I suppose you have chosen to part with the Bonaparte road. That can only be for the best. On the other hand, implying that I, like you, edit the page motivated by a particular POV is ridiculous.

I don't care as much about that article as to tag it for NPOV and cleanup, but I'll make sure that, in case the tag is added by someone, it stays there until it begins to look like a proper text. And, as I have already indicated, I'll also be watching and reporting any attempt to delete it or POV it - even if the concept may become outdated (and there is no indication that it will), the article will still be relevant (just like the ones on various canards or Nazi eugenics should not be deleted only because the concepts are proven to be wrong). Dahn 16:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You could have spared yourself that by noting that: a. a read the articles; b. I said that the articles in question paraphrased the law (it would not matter that you did, but you paraphrased a paraphrase). Since this is about the terms used, and the implications they have, one would have to assume that the law was read correctly and fully - and we can do better than assume. See my point? Furthermore, the BBC article is indeed reliable, and the Gardianul one might be (although it clearly has a stated bias, and although another article from a Romanian newspaper that you quoted in the past proved that it read "horse" and understood "donkey"). Noting this, I have to ask, have you compared the articles? Because what the BBC seems to say is that the Serbia will acknowledge Romanian as the language of Vlachs, by default, without however indicating that Vlach is no longer given some official recognition, and without indicating that Vlach and Romanian are the same. Again, you and I may postulate that they are the same, but I hope you note that this should add nothing. Dahn 18:31, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Steag Unilat.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Steag Unilat.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian spelling in Moldova

With this edit, the Romanian language article states that in 2001 the official spelling in Moldova has become identical to that in Romania. The only proof given for this statement is a book, Dicţionarul ortografic al limbii române. This, however, does not mean that the new spelling has become official in the country. Do you have any more specific reference? — AdiJapan ☎ 07:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Steag Unilat.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Steag Unilat.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abusive edits

Please don't call my edits abusive, there are edits like any other edits, and they were resulting from the GA review, nobody else took notice I did whatever I thought is good, you are free to re-add whichever picture you consider important, but please abstain from calling good-faith edits "abusive". -- AdrianTM 22:17, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:11120.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:11120.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 18:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Poster TIFF 2007.jpg

~~Image Copyright problem~~
Thank you for uploading Image:Poster TIFF 2007.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Cluj-Napoca

Servus Danutz, am vazut ca tu ai facut mult in pagina pt Cluj-Napoca. E bine si sunt fericit ca oameni acuma au mai multi de informatii in privinta cu orasul. Sunt un englez si locuesc in Cluj. Am schimbat catva de ce tu ai scris - sper poti sa accepti alterarile mei. Daca nu esti de acord, putem sa discutam. Am experienta cu limba englezi dar inca nu mult de talent cu limba romana, scuze! Cu stima --Frankieparley (talk) 07:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Foarte promiţător, însă dat fiind că majoritatea criticilor s-au legat de limbă îmi este tare greu să mă ocup de copy-editing. Îmi place să cred că vorbesc bine engleză, dar nu la nivelul la care să fiu la fel de fluent ca un nativ (iar pentru un articol de calitate ai nevoie să scrii ca un nativ talentat). Cred că va trebui să te bazezi pe ajutorul unor nativi sau al unor români care stau de suficient timp într-o ţară anglofonă încât să nu le mai scape stângăcii. --Gutza ^{T T+} 11:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Clujeanul front page.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Clujeanul front page.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Etimologie Cluj-Napoca

Vezi că ţi-am lăsat un mesaj pe pagina ta de discuţii de la wiki-ro, legat de etimologia Clujului. --R O ^{A M A T A A}| msg 17:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, zi-mi unde mai ai nevoie de surse şi/sau completări. Am luat de la biblioteca câteva cărţi despre Cluj şi acum pot specifica cu titlul cărţii, respectiv pagina. --R O ^{A M A T A A}| msg 07:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, în regulă. --R O ^{A M A T A A}| msg 20:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ţi le-am pus pe pagina ta de discuţii de la rowiki. Dacă acel citat incomodează, îl scoatem şi gata. Nu am vrem acum să stau în sala de bibliotecă, altfel aş putea documenta cu mai multe surse serioase afirmaţia. --R O ^{A M A T A A}| msg 19:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Iuliu Maniu Street, Cluj-Napoca

A tag has been placed on Iuliu Maniu Street, Cluj-Napoca requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ninety:one 13:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

Hi! Here is a voting about Bendery/Bender/Tighina: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bender%2C_Moldova#Statement_of_Title_Solution —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.142.252.220 (talk) 18:22, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:11120.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:11120.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:14, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Poster TIFF 2007.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Poster TIFF 2007.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wide image IE7

Template:Wide image IE7 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Poster TIFF 2007.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Poster TIFF 2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Banner 468 60 cu brodura.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Banner 468 60 cu brodura.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:51, 29 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:51, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dacia

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient Dacia. Would you like to join the WikiProject Dacia? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to these topics. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 03:37, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have you thought about reading some Lucian Boia? Why don't you include the fact in some of your articles that in the 19th century the Romanian language was purged of Slav words, words which were replaced by French words to make the language appear more Latin. And where were the Dacians between AD 271 and the 13th century? History is based on written records, do you have any? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.140.80 (talk) 06:50, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 14:35, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Logo jolidon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo jolidon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Strada Piezișă

The article Strada Piezișă has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:19, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moldovan language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 11 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Moldovan language page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Radio Cluj

The article Radio Cluj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't find any sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Septrillion (talk) 19:03, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Radio Cluj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Radio Cluj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Cluj until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Septrillion (talk) 17:37, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Piața A-Z

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Piața A-Z to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Naraht (talk) 17:12, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Piața A-Z

The article Piața A-Z has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Note that this listing is independent of the notice just above, which has to do with the language of the article, while this notice has to do with the notability of the topic of the article, irrespective of language. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 05:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Romania, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 11:10, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have retracted the warning, but it is time to ponder your own actions: your edit had all the red flags of being a fake edit (as explained at my talk page and including you complaining about being reverted at the same article, in the past). Everything about your edit was wrong, except the figures. No wonder that you have been reverted in the past: you actions come over as extremely clumsy. This is not an attack, but an opportunity to learn and improve. Tgeorgescu (talk) 18:29, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Danutz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Danutz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]