User talk:RainR

Hey there and welcome to Wikipedia!

I noticed that you moved the content from Confurence to ConFurence. If you want to move an article, please use the "move" link you can find on top of every article. Otherwise you will only move the current revision of the article and not its history, which is very important for our articles. See Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page for more information about this. If you got any questions, feel free to ask me. :-) --Conti|✉ 12:57, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

CastleCops

Hi. Would you mind having a look at Wikipedia:Votes_for_undeletion#CastleCops? I am merely asking for a copy so that I might impove and resubmit if appropriate. --Ikester 01:50, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Furry lifestyler

Thank you for your constant watch against vandalism on furry-related pages. :) Almafeta 10:08, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

dedicated 2 spyware

I moved this to Talk:Spyware

multiple accounts

just woke up and see there is a hot discussion regarding this matter. now you suspect me using multiple accounts. Sorry but, I dont have multiple accounts. maybe you want to check the IPs? Ugnius 06:28, 10 October 2005

I don't have the ability to check IPs. Anyway, you could use a proxy or different ISP. I think it's extremely suspicious that a brand-new account jumped right to your side of the debate. --RainR 06:41, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO they just show neutral opinion. Anyway I asked some old editors to review this issue. I will not revert any links for now.

Paragraph in Spyware article

I notice you restored a paragraph to the Spyware article that was advice on writing good encyclopedia entries. I didn't feel it belonged in the article itelf, but it was worth keeping nonetheless, so I cut and pasted it into the article's talk page. Reyk 22:40, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. --RainR 00:19, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Search engine optimization

This article is under a constant attack of spammers and because of this all links and references must be approved before hand on the talk page. Thank you--129.240.71.78 10:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CoolWebSearch

Can you please explain the reasons for the tags on the talk page instead of just arbitrarily putting them back? - Glen ^T _C 08:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a spyware company sympathizer?

The way you edit these articles makes you come off as a person who works at a spyware company... 71.71.6.113 06:02, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not even close. --RainR 06:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]