Execution by elephant is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This is a great topic, but I fear the article as it stands is quite a ways away from the current featured article criteria. The main issue seems to be sourcing: statements like "Elephants were widely used across the Indian subcontinent and South Asia as a method of execution", "African powers were not known to make as much use of the animals in warfare or ceremonial affairs compared to their Asian counterparts", and "There are fewer records of elephants being used as straightforward executioners for the civil population", among others, lack citations altogether. Additionally, while the heavy reliance on primary sources isn't a problem per se, it does raise issues of synthesis and other forms of original research. Hopefully these issues can be resolved; if they aren't, the article may be taken to WP:FAR, where editors will discuss removing its featured article status. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:21, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Extraordinary Writ: - There's some original research here, as well. Looking at the statement There are fewer records of elephants being used as straightforward executioners for the civil population. One such example is mentioned by Josephus and the deuterocanonical book of 3 Maccabees in connection with the Egyptian Jews, though the story is likely apocryphal. 3 Maccabees is a religious text that does not mention Josephus, does not identify the story as likely apocryphal, and does not support "there are fewer records ...". Hog FarmTalk03:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree: that's one of the many "issues of synthesis and other forms of original research" that I noted above. Another example: taking four primary-source accounts and distilling them into "Elephants were widely used across the Indian subcontinent and South Asia as a method of execution", with no citations to secondary sources, is textbook WP:SYNTH. There's a lot of that going on here, and I fear that the relative lack of secondary sources available about this topic led the author to carry out the "analysis, evaluation, interpretation, [and] synthesis" role himself. Oh, and one more thing: some of the citation formatting is inadequate to meet crit. 2c. I'm really not sure what Jack Weatherford-Genghis Khan, p.116 and Natesan, G.A. The Indian Review, p. 160 even refer to. There are an awful lot of issues here; resolving them would seem to be a Herculean task. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:58, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also pinging Gog the Mild. Do you see anything obviously wrong with the Carthage content? I have a vague memory about reading about execution by elephant in one of the Punic wars articles you wrote. This is looking like a FAR priority. Hog FarmTalk04:36, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An elephantine task, surely. In terms of general structure, the modern continental division seems quite anachronistic for this topic and unrelated to the content at hand. The map used to illustrate the article also doesn't match the text, I can't identify what it's based on. CMD (talk) 04:52, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Hog Farm: Oh dear. Looks like WP:TNT to me. There is nothing inherently implausible about the Carthaginian content, although a source would be nice. I have added a bit on a well sourced example of Carthaginian elephant executions. Among many other things MOS:QUOTE "While quotations are an indispensable part of Wikipedia, try not to overuse them. Using too many quotes is incompatible with an encyclopedic writing style ... It is generally recommended that content be written in Wikipedia editors' own words. Consider paraphrasing quotations into plain and concise text when appropriate" looks like a significant issue. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
the text is taken from the reference, which itself has a (n unavailable) footnote. I think this needs its own reference, or anecdote with reference, as it is nowhere otherwise mentioned. 142.163.195.54 (talk) 16:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
