Talk:Kings Norton

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

West Midlands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Birmingham High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Birmingham, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Birmingham on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BirminghamWikipedia:WikiProject BirminghamTemplate:WikiProject BirminghamBirmingham articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Worcestershire Low‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Maybe it would be useful to add some stuff about Kings Norton in the Civil War? For example: the skirmish on the village green between Lord Willoughby's parliamentarians and Prince Rupert's troops is of interest. (17th October 1642)

Also, the story about Queen Henrietta Maria staying there (maybe in the Saracen's Head) while the army she'd raised in Yorkshire camped on land behind the church (Camp Lane gets its name from this).

The Old Grammar School and the Saracen's Head are mentioned in the main Birmingham article, but not here!

The Mop Fair could be worth a mention: held from the 16th century.

Go right ahead! Andy Mabbett 15:31, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)

OK, I've added a little bit for the moment. I'll add some more later if this is OK :-)

--Amortize 14:26, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I've added a little on the church. The spelling of St Nicolas really is correct! --Amortize 15:45, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I've got a couple of photos of the Old Grammar School and the Saracen's Head. I've taken them myself, so would there be any problem adding them? --Amortize 09:01, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I have changed the opening paragraph as Kings Norton is now in the district of Northfield - this administrative change occured in June 2006. Also added reference to the Urban District Council --Duncan 20:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page is looking very messy - its really just a single block of text. I propose that its restructured to make it read more easily, along the lines of the Moseley article. Does anyone object? Duncan 18:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No objections here, please be bold and go ahead! DWaterson 01:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Major reorder (phase I) done. Hope people like it! To the marching band folk - I've put your link into the text... Duncan 11:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Correct spelling please..........

Please can we lovers of King's Norton get the spelling right. It is named after the King's Norton; it therefore was something that belonged to the King. So please its King's not Kings!! Brumman19 21:47, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no apostrophe in Kings Norton, per [1] [2] [3] [4]. This article explains the history of the spelling and the dropping of the apostrophe from current usage. Cheers, DWaterson 23:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact the market charter refers to 'kingsnorton' without an apostrophe (or indeed a space). As this was signed by King James I suggest that we take his arbitration on it. Duncan (talk) 15:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Local organisations section

This needs to be merged with another section in the article, otherwise it will start becoming an exhaustive list of non-notable groups in the Kings Norton area. It is difficult enough to work out the importance of the organisations already listed. - Erebus555 (talk) 16:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How many C15 buildings?

"the Green contains three later medieval building from the 15th century, the Old Grammar School, the Saracen's Head...two of these ancient buildings..."

Is there a third building missing from the list, or should the above be edited to something like "the Green contains two later medieval buildings from the 15th century: the Old Grammar School and the Saracen's Head, which won the second series of the BBC's Restoration competition in 2004" ? Mittfh (talk) 15:57, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone know enogh to contribute to a primrose poolfarm and hawekesly article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.44.79 (talk) 13:30, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge of Kings Norton Royal British Legion Youth Marching Band

I think that article would be better as a section in this article, since I do not think it passes the criteria for notability in its own right. Comments? Willplatts (talk) 17:30, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I'm not sure it's even notable enough to merge into here - AFD might be a better destination. DWaterson (talk) 21:23, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Sorry, I don't think its significant enough locally to be mentioned. If we merge the article here we open ourselves to either domination of the article by a single organisation or a list of every organisation in the area... The KNRBLYMB article should stand or fall by itself. Duncan (talk) 19:36, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Book from Price and Demidowicz

I think we need to look at refreshing the article given the considerable new info from this book. I'll try and incorporate stuff over the next few weeks, but if anyone else want a go... Duncan (talk) 09:57, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kings Norton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130131175251/http://bham.webschools.co.uk/hawkesley/contactus.htm to http://bham.webschools.co.uk/hawkesley/contactus.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:20, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kings Norton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070206092423/http://www.3estates.co.uk/newDeal/ to http://www.3estates.co.uk/newDeal/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111001052146/http://www.kingsnorton.info/ to http://www.kingsnorton.info/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]