Talk:British Rail Class 121
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Naming convention
[edit]There is a discussion about the naming convention to use for articles about British locomotive and multiple unit classes at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (British railway locomotive and multiple unit classes). Your comments are more than welcome. Thryduulf 22:27, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
"Only one is left in passenger service"?
[edit]What about the Arriva one that's just started on the Cardiff Bay shuttle? I have no local knowledge of that, but why isn't it being counted? Loganberry (Talk) 04:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
It's actually contradictory of itself. If you look, it says only one is left in passenger service and then goes on to talk about the one that ATW have just reintroduced. I'll change that. Worley-d 13:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Class 121 or 122?
[edit]Not to be picky or anything, but my railway enthusiast instinct tells me the green unit in the picture at the top of the page is a class 122 and not 121. Am I right? Tom walker (talk) 10:51, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Its definitely not got the right headcode box for a 121. Unless its been rebuilt with the wrong cab (parts from a 116 or 122?) it's not a 121... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.159.86 (talk) 09:35, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Rapists Train
[edit]I remember at one time the class was famous for having more poeple raped on it than any other. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.234.159.97 (talk) 12:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Commons images
[edit]Hi. Just to let you know, the Commons category for Class 121s is now completely sorted by operator and livery. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
121032
[edit]No sources cite this as being used as a spares donor, therefore all references to it have been removed. Infact, it has seen service since the transfer to Chiltern. Lord Castellan Creed (talk) 18:53, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on British Rail Class 121. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131221005408/http://www.rssb.co.uk/RGS/Pages/MECHANICALANDELECTRICALCOUPLINGINDEX.aspx to http://www.rssb.co.uk/RGS/Pages/MECHANICALANDELECTRICALCOUPLINGINDEX.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100703123005/http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk:80/about-us/our-train-fleet/ to http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/about-us/our-train-fleet/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131220185827/http://railcar.co.uk/type/121/121.html to http://railcar.co.uk/type/121/121.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)