Talk:Pileated woodpecker

Birds Low‑importance

Pileated woodpecker is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Folk names

See Ivory-billed Discussion for a rather lengthy discussion (with references) of folk names applied to the Pileated and the Ivory-billed Woodpeckers. This needs to be summarized and incorporated into both articles. Summary: the Pileated Woodpecker was, and is still, referred to as the Lord God Bird in the Southeastern United States. The name appears to be a corruption of logcock, referring to propensity of the Pileated to feed on downed logs. The Ivory-billed was known as logcock as well, but there is no evidence in the printed sources I can find that it was ever widely known as Lord God Bird. I need to check recent works (Race to Save the Lord God Bird and Gallagher's The Grail Bird) to see if they have any further information on the folk names. I have checked several other authoritative works, and they all seem to support Lord God Bird as a folk name for the Pileated, not the Ivory-bill. --Cotinis 03:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In Mississippi and probably over a much larger area the pileated woodpecker is known as an Indian hen. The name Good God is retained in folk memory and may have been applied to either the Indian hen or the pileated woodpecker.70.233.138.5 (talk) 02:45, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I happened to be reading "Letters From Alabama" by Philip Henry Gosse, a trained English zoologist who spent a year near Selma, Alabama in 1858 observing flora and fauna. He says that local people called both the pileated and ivory billed woodpeckers "logcocks", and says that neither is rare but that the pileated is much more common. He states that another authority of the time is of the opinion that the diet of the ivory billed woodpecker consists entirely of grubs but that he knows this is not correct as he personally killed two and found they had been feeding heavily on black cherries.70.233.136.52 (talk) 04:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Woody Woodpecker?!

He has a red face. Is actually Red-headed Woodpecker with tuft added for drama. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Red-headed Woodpecker article seems to agree with you, but the Ivory Billed Woodpecker article says he's one of those. this certianly needs to be cleared up. Michael1115 (talk) 15:39, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Woody Woodpecker is a cartoon character, and his salient characteristic is his annoying behavior to humans. Statements from his creators indicate that Woody was inspired by the nuisance behavior of the acorn woodpecker. (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101665227). Woody's appearance is what a team of cartoonists decades ago agreed was "woodpeckery" and doesn't really represent the plumage of a real species, but probably most people figured that out a long time ago without needing to do research. Pileateds are shy and are not generally considered nuisances by humans. 70.146.174.69 (talk) 15:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Pileated woodpecker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

circular description

"The flight of these birds is strong and direct, but undulates in the way characteristic of woodpeckers."

That tells me that woodpecker flight undulates like woodpecker flight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:CA10:18A0:0:0:0:6D6 (talk) 00:58, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't extinct

The article has been edited a few times now, labelling them as extinct. I'm fairly certain due to these articles emerging regarding the USA declaring 23 species as extinct. One of these species is the ivory-billed woodpecker, a related species to the pileated woodpecker because they almost look the same, but they are not the same. I can promise that the pileated woodpeckers are not extinct, I seen one a month ago in a local park here in Southern Ontario, Canada. Jebbles (talk) 10:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most definitely not extinct. The Christmas bird count spotted 86 of them in my city last year, the second-most common woodpecker https://www.edmontonchristmasbirdcount.ca/results.html Meters (talk) 04:48, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Dryocopus pileatus.ogg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:22, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

'Status' section

Hi folks,

I'm not sure how necessary the section labelled 'Status' in this article is. The overall tone of the paragraph doesn't, in my opinion, fit the Wikipedia "encyclopedic style," and Status isn't generally a header I've seen on other bird pages.

I don't have a strong opinion either way, but wanted to ask here before either trying to rewrite the section or removing it. DuckWrangler97 (talk) 00:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]