User talk:Spoon!

RAR

We gotta talk. You edit like you are a corporate sponsor for WinRAR. You have to allow a summary of archive software that uses the RAR format to be fair. Your recent deletion of the forum to list RAR archive software is highly biased. Biased editing is not in line with Wikipedia values. I am not going to let you get away with that. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 15:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Messages

Hey Spoon!, How's it going on your side of the room? 131.215.240.181 05:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Did you decide that math notation should be written only in TeX on Wikipedia? If so you may want to look at pros and cons at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics. No one objects to TeX in displayed math, but embedded in lines of text it may sometimes look bad. Michael Hardy 00:08, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hey Spoon, Sorry, Caltech's motto isn't "Let There Be Light"—that's the University of California motto, from which the info table was enthusiastically copied. Yeah, that was embarrassing! (As far as I know, Caltech's motto is still "The truth shall make you free"; at the least, it seems to be the de facto motto). —Gku 08:07, Aug 28, 2004 (UTC)

hi, wht do you think about removing Radiography from the pages needing attention? or do you think it still needs a lot of attention? I guess the last 3 paragraphs could use some rewording, but the article looks a lot better now? Deelkar 17:57, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Hiya, in terms of the article on sp² bonds where do you think the article is right now? Is it good enough to remove the attention tag, or is there more to be done? EagleFalconn 15:58, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Hmmm... no user page.

I guess there really is no Spoon! - Ta bu shi da yu 04:17, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Image:FlemingCannon.jpg marked for deletion

An image you uploaded, Image:FlemingCannon.jpg, has been listed for deletion because it does not contain source/copyright information and is not being used by an article. If you do not want the image deleted:

Update the image description page with source/copyright information as well as an Image copyright tag such as {{GFDL}}.
Add a comment to its entry on Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion explaining that you have provided the requested information.

If no action is taken on your part, the image will be deleted in 7 days. CanisRufus 06:22, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)

Image:RickettsHovse.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:RickettsHovse.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--Bash 22:12, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Caltech hollywood sign.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Caltech hollywood sign.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 22:18, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:PageCrest.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PageCrest.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:59, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Linux

In case you are interested in this wikiproject... Best wishes, Samsara (talk • contribs) 17:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:04, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the See Also link on the Iterated binary operation page. NoJoy 20:31, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Electron configurations of the elements (data page)

Re: [1] - So far, this holds the title of the most extensive independent addition of further sources to 'my' datapages (wish there were more). You checked that everything else agrees with the table? Nice! Femto 11:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hey, Spoon!

I've been reading through the archives about the debate over deletion/retention of information on the undergrad houses. Thank you for making excellent arguments in favor of preservation.

A Lloydie. DavidCBryant 04:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:LloydHouse.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 02:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:DabneyHovse.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:DabneyHovse.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary & Halting of Edit War requested

Would you please add Edit Summaries to your edits on Comparison of web browsers? Also, please stop adding templates for the "cost" and "open source" columns. Color coding was explicitely non-requested for these columns.
Please, look at the edit history and the talk page before you make a change that was reverted once before. There is a reason why your edit was reverted, and you should discuss the reasons and reach a consensus before proceeding to change that aspect.
When I reverted your edit, I have provided a link to the ongoing discussion as to give you a possiblity to express your opinion / convince others why this would be a good idea. Please give me respect by not making these changes over and over again. Thanks. --Grey 04:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:AveryLogo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AveryLogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:BlackerHovse.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BlackerHovse.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help Desk/Computing

I think your answer about how to crack XP passwords was highly irresponsible. I know I'm making an assumption here, but providing such information to someone who may well be a high-school student only looking to play pranks on their fellow students, is not such a good idea. That is the reason why I was sceptical of the OP's motives in my reply; and probably why ⁪ffroth was cagey in their reply too. That said, I think your 2nd reply took a more reasonable approach to the question.

Anyway, I took the liberty of removing the link to the article over at wikibooks. And, frankly, I think that article should be deleted from Wikibooks as well.

Astronaut 15:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of CenterIM

CenterIM, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that CenterIM satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CenterIM and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of CenterIM during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Hammer1980·^talk 00:16, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Corporate Average Fuel Economy

Spoon, your edits to CAFE appear to come uncomfortably close to constituting vandalism. Your advocacy for a novel gallons-per-mile standard violates Wikipedia standards regarding original research, verifiability, point of view, and what Wikipedia is not. It is rather strange to see this sort of inappropriate activism from an editor with a contribution history such as yours. Nevertheless, I will assume good faith and thank you for please not doing it again. If there's verifiable, significant, organised, published advocacy for the sort of gallons-per-mile standard you espouse, by all means please feel free to add appropriate mention and references to the article. However, it seems to me that someone with your strong background in maths must surely realise there is no practical difference in effect between a standard that mandates minimum allowable distance travellable on a volume unit of fuel, and a standard that mandates maximum allowable fuel consumption per distance unit travelled. A regulation of either format can easily be set at a numeric value mandating a standard of fuel economy identical to that mandated by a regulation of the other format. Thanks for being a coöperative Wikipedian. --Scheinwerfermann (talk) 05:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, because it matters when you take the average. If a company has all its cars at 10 mpg (0.1 gpm), then its mpg average is 10 mpg, and its gpm average is 0.1 gpm. But if a company has half of its cars at 1 mpg (1 gpm), and half at 19 mpg (0.052 gpm), it still has an average of 10 mpg, but its gpm average is 0.52 gpm. If you think about it, you will realize that the second is much worse. A company with cars with a wide range of fuel economies will use more total fuel for the same average mpg than one with a small range of fuel economies. Companies can increase their miles-per-gallon rating by producing lots of cars with high fuel economy, which do not save as much total fuel as the low fuel economy cars waste, but draws up their average more. This is a basic math. There are lots of sources that can be found for this. I was hoping that other people can expand it. But if you don't want it on there, then fine; have it your way. --Spoon! (talk) 06:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CAFE is calculated on a sales-weighted basis, not on the basis of the number of models in a maker's line as you're assuming here. --Scheinwerfermann (talk) 16:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I've seen your important contributions for the article Recurrence relation. I'm looking for the general (non-iterative) non-trigonometric expression for the exact trigonometric constants of the form: ${\begin{aligned}\cos {\frac {\pi }{2^{n}}}\end{aligned}}$ , when n is natural (and is not given in advance). Do you know of any such general (non-iterative) non-trigonometric expression? (note that any exponential-expression-over-the-imaginaries is also excluded since it's trivially equivalent to a real-trigonometric expression).

Let me explain: if we choose n=1 then the term ${\begin{aligned}\cos {\frac {\pi }{2^{n}}}\end{aligned}}$ becomes "0", which is a simple (non-trigonometric) constant. If we choose n=2 then the term ${\begin{aligned}\cos {\frac {\pi }{2^{n}}}\end{aligned}}$ becomes ${\begin{aligned}{\frac {1}{\sqrt {2}}}\end{aligned}}$ , which is again a non-trigonometric expression. etc. etc. Generally, for every natural n, the term ${\begin{aligned}\cos {\frac {\pi }{2^{n}}}\end{aligned}}$ becomes a non-trigonometric expression. However, when n is not given in advance, then the very expression ${\begin{aligned}\cos {\frac {\pi }{2^{n}}}\end{aligned}}$ per se - is a trigonometric expression. I'm looking for the general (non-iterative) non-trigonometric expression equivalent to ${\begin{aligned}\cos {\frac {\pi }{2^{n}}}\end{aligned}}$ , when n is not given in advance. If not for the cosine - then for the sine or the tangent or the cotangent.

Eliko (talk) 08:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would probably be better for you to ask the Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics about this one. I can't help you much. The only recurrence relation I can think of to use is the half-angle formula

\cos {\frac {\theta }{2}}={\sqrt {\frac {1+\cos \theta }{2}}}

. But this recurrence relation is not linear (it involves a square root and stuff), and I only know how to solve linear recurrence relations. Sorry. Cheers, --Spoon! (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of NoteEdit

An article that you have been involved in editing, NoteEdit, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NoteEdit. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 12:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Input requested at Sunset

Hi Spoon!,

After a quick browse through the history of Sunset I've noticed you've previously edited the page. Your input is now requested in choosing a new lead picture here. Thanks for your time, --Fir0002 00:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ruby's boolean type(s)

Are TrueClass and FalseClass distinct types? If so, what values do they hold, just one? From what I understand they are distinct types. That seems odd to me so, I want to make sure I understand. Mike92591 (talk) 02:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah they are distinct types, each having just one value. It seems kind of odd to me too. --Spoon! (talk) 05:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still awaiting your answer for my question. Eliko (talk) 20:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

radical alterations to the intro to quantum mechanics article

Hi,

A new editor has unilaterally made many drastic changes to the article Introduction_to_quantum_mechanics to which you have made contributions. I do not think that the changes are desirable. I do not want to start an edit war. Could you please have a look at it? Thanks. P0M (talk)

math

hi spoon! i am the voice of mud and i have a question for you. do you like math? The voice of mud (talk) 15:35, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:56, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join Stanford's WikiProject!

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Stanford University, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Stanford University. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

ralphamale (talk) 21:51, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adjectivals and demonyms for countries and nations

As a contributor to the article, you may wish to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adjectivals and demonyms for countries and nations (2nd nomination).
—Wavelength (talk) 02:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thamsanqa Jantjie

The article Thamsanqa Jantjie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:BLP1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:14, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thamsanqa Jantjie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thamsanqa Jantjie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thamsanqa Jantjie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Martin451 16:10, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Comparison of programming languages (object-oriented programming) may have broken the syntax by modifying 5 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:43, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Function object may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:21, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 14 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Natural-born-citizen clause page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Spoon!. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Spoon!. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Spoon!. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Spoon!. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]