User talk:Tedneeman

Hello,

It looks like you have been contributing for quite awhile, so no need for the customary {welcome} blurb; I suspect you know your way around here pretty well by now. In any case, just a quick note to say I liked your addition to Don Giovanni. It is the kind of information I wish we had more of in the opera articles.

All the best, -- Viajero 12:58, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind welcome :) Tedneeman 23:28, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bellamy?

On GWS, you added:

David Bellamy, British environmental campaigner who has since retracted his views

if he has retracted his views, I'd be interested to know... I haven't seen anything. I know he's been sacked by CAT though. William M. Connolley 12:26:29, 2005-07-22 (UTC).

Martin Niemoller

Nice catch on that redirect for Niemöller. It's hard to type umlauts. Thanks.--TJ 16:21, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of atonal pieces

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of atonal pieces, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of atonal pieces. Thank you. S.dedalus 00:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Australian composers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Australian composers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australian composers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:55, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]