Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israeli Bias

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:11, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Israeli Bias

Inherently POV, original research, self-referential. Jayjg ^(talk) 06:46, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 06:46, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Speedy delete. Rick K 07:03, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
Do not Delete. Majestiq does not refrence itself. Furthermore, maybe one would want to wait to read the content because deciding to delete it. Perhaps the speed at which this article has been chosen for deletion show that indeed an Israeli bias exists and therefore this article is important.
- Maybe one read the header and understands the purpose, which is to write a POV screed. Rick K 09:10, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
Delete per the above. Radiant _* 10:16, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
Delete for self reference. Jeltz talk 12:36, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete there is no way this could ever be NPOV --Bucephalus 17:29, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete, inherrently POV, self-referential. Dave the Red (talk) 17:57, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Whatever you were going to write, put it into an essay and post it at a blog. Better yet, make comments on the articles you feel have a bias and see if others agree. --Asriel86 18:06, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Inherently POV, belongs on a blog GabrielF 23:42, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete, POV. Firebug 09:57, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete, an original research project. --MPerel^{( talk | contrib)} 01:34, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
Delete as POV. To get up on my soapbox for a moment, I am saddend that instead of using Wikipedia as a forum for healing and understanding BOTH sides in the Israeli-Palestinian (or Palestinian-Israeli if you prefer) conflict continually use this resource to propagate the intolerance, misunderstanding, and even outright hate that continues to fuel the violence in Israel/Palestine/insert own name for region here. Indrian 06:44, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. POV, original research, self-referential. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 07:11, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. While the phenomenon described certainly exists, making an article on it clearly constitutes original research. - Mustafaa 07:11, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Redirect I'm not sure where to though. There should be a page of the Bias' of Media towards the middle East. The US media is generally percieved as being Biased towards Israel, whereas the UK and most EU nations (And, according to Jayjg myself as well) are seen to have an Anti-Israeli bias. There should be an article detailing the varying percieved bias' and this should re-direct to it. --Irishpunktom\^talk 13:46, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, pov biascruft. ComCat 06:39, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Discussing article bias is what article talk pages are for. Your failure to get consensus from other editors does not grant you this kind of remedy. Postdlf 00:38, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.