User talk:Preaky

Hi Preaky, Welcome!

Hello, Preaky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! dbenbenn | talk 00:29, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Article...............

the article Contact Consequences is now being cleaned up. Will you reconsider your vote ?Martial Law 08:33, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There are sources all over the place, incl. Wikipedia, and, since I'm a "military brat", I've heard other soldiers,airmen discussing this sort of thing. I have @ least 8 books that discuss alien contact, all written before there was any Internet, much less Wikipedia.Martial Law 04:25, 16 November 2005 (UTC) :)[reply]

While I was "Out West" other people had,(to be polite,considering Wiki's profanity/obscenity policies), had told me that, IF the ridicule (See Robertson Panel )of those that have had UFO/Alien encounters do NOT cease, the govt. apologises for the disrespect they've caused, and IF there is alien contact, they'll revolt to get both vindication and revenge, since the govt. determines what is justice, what is not.Martial Law 04:25, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

One book I have refers to the Bermuda Triangle and UFOs.Martial Law

Jewish "races"

Thanks for your comments at Israel; unfortunately, this editor has a rather singular view, and seems very concerned about race, which, aside from being irrelevant, is, in my view, a highly unscientific concept. Jayjg ^(talk) 17:38, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I am sorry that I reverted your accidental blanking of a page with the edit summary "rvv". Unfortunately, I did not realize that you blanked the page accidentally until I had already reverted it. I can't tell the difference between vandals who blank pages and legitimate users whose browsers don't work. Due to the quantity of vandalism that needs to be reverted, it is a lot easier to type "rv" than to type a long edit summary. Andrew_pmk | Talk 21:06, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom

I want to thank everyone who took the time to vote on my ArbCom candidacy. I have placed some thoughts on this matter on my user page and would welcome your thoughts.--Edivorce 02:09, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Preaky. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Preaky. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Preaky. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]