Launceston, Tasmania was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Launceston, Tasmania is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Is pronunciation really so militantly uniform in Australia that an alternative pronunciation is said to be mispronounced? My American ears can hear VERY little difference between the "correct" and "mispronounced" pronunciations given in this article—certainly not enough difference to label one of them as mispronounced. I'd think just the slight differences in pronunciation by people in the same family could allow for such a slight variation as this. Would it offend Australian sensibilities just to give them as two possible pronunciations, not one that's right and the other wrong? At what point does the mispronunciation of a word happen so often (as the article says this one does) that it can be considered an alternative pronunciation as opposed to a wrong pronunciation? —104.244.192.86 (talk) 01:20, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The pronunciation of place names is quite another matter from the pronunciation of common nouns (and other words, of course). It is generally assumed that the "correct" pronunciation of a place name (in the common language of its inhabitants) is what the inhabitants call it. It is a standing joke/irritation among the people of Launceston (to be fair most of us, most of the time, probably don't care that much) that other Australians - even some other Tasmanians, mispronounce the city's name. Whatever an American might think, to a person from Launceston the difference in the way the first syllable sounds can produce the (momentary) illusion that it is another place altogether that the speaker is talking about. Just to compound the issue - an English person would elide the second syllable entirely, after the usual pronunciation of the name of the Cornish town. I can quite understand that this is a complete non-issue to an American reader, who is likely to pronounce our city's name in various creative and interesting ways. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 04:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
haha - we of the southern and western (Tasmanian) heritage tend to reduce it all to lonnie whichever way you want to read that.
Not going to get into the Derby/Darby one (lol). The first syllable of "lonny" (very commonly used here, too) is the same as the first syllable of the proper name of the city, which may prove a useful way of remembering for a speaker of a non-Northern Tasmanian dialect. -Soundofmusicals (talk) 04:59, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]