Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enfield Chase

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 15:34, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)

Enfield Chase railway station (was Enfield Chase)

Pointless stub--69.11.250.209 00:04, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Note: Completing the VfD process begun incorrectly by the above anon. This posting is not a vote. Rick K 00:54, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
Keep and expand. The precedent for railroad stations has been set. That said, this article is an embarassment. Meelar (talk) 02:09, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. And expand. Cnwb 06:41, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep, expand, categorise - David Gerard 01:28, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Note: I've moved the page to the more correct title of Enfield Chase railway station and started a new stub at Enfield Chase on the ancient forest. sjorford →•← 17:06, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep. --Grouse 13:13, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.