User talk:Clemmy

Beneath a Steel Sky

Just wondering if I could get your reasonings behind changing the Image:Beneath a Steel Sky.jpg to its current version?

Thanks -- elykyllek 12:51, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining, I appreciate it. -- elykyllek 12:00, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)

Nick Dyer-Witheforde

I took off your NPOV tag for the article. You need to make some claim as to it's absence of NPOV. The sign tag itself directs people to the TALK page and you have not made an effort to explain your reasoning- how do you expect others to agree/disagre?--Mikerussell 04:42, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for pointing this out. fixed. (clem 12:14, 20 October 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Katie Holmes

Greetings! You have edited the Katie Holmes page in the past. I've completely reworked the article and have posted it on WP:PR in the hopes of advancing it to WP:FAC. I would be grateful for your comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Katie Holmes/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 18:57, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revolution Software Freeware License

Hello, Revolution Software Freeware License use in Beneath a Steel Sky and in Flight of the Amazon Queen in 2003 is more than a freeware, its realy a free software license [1]. So i just create Commons:Category:Beneath a Steel Sky and i move screenshot from frensh Wikipedia to Commons (see Commons:Image:Beneath a Steel Sky.png). What do you think about doing the same ?

User:Elykyllek is not here since a lot of time, so i send this message to you for this image Image:Beneath a Steel Sky.jpg.
Image:Bass-roo.jpg can be move too. maybe u can talk to User:UnlimitedAccess
but Image:Bass-beer.jpg, i dont know, maybe it need Revolution Software agrement, or its just impossible.

Thanks a lot. fr:Utilisateur:Bayo 12:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

feel free to move my screenshot over to Commons (I don't exactly know how to do it)
I guess same applies to bass-beer (and even if not, I doubt Revolution will ever complain)
Flight of the Amazon Queen wasn't by Revolution but by IBI - feel free to move it over anyways :)

clem 19:06, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I move

I put your contribution in public domain, i think its better, the more important work in on the game, and the image is already under a Software Freeware License, but you can change. Thanks a lot. fr:Utilisateur:Bayo 13:02, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

I LOVE DE'MON —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.61.168.7 (talk) 23:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kyrandia1ingame.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kyrandia1ingame.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:23, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image discussion at article 17 Mile Drive

A discussion is underway about images on an article you have contributed to. Please help find a consensus for the article stub at: Talk:17-Mile Drive#17 Mile Drive info box and section images replacement.--Amadscientist (talk) 04:26, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Clemmy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

BobsLoveChild (talk) 15:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]