User talk:Eb.hoop
This user may have left Wikipedia. Eb.hoop has not edited Wikipedia since 7 February 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
This is Eb.hoop's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2 |
A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. It mostly follows the lead section; how does it look? - Dank (push to talk) 23:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Looks good to me! - Eb.hoop (talk) 09:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Precious
[edit]scientists
Thank you for quality articles such as Josiah Willard Gibbs, an "eminent scientist", based on scientific background, for beginning your "career" here with expanding, quotes and anecdotes, for a minimal user page that made me smile, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Four years ago, you were recipient no. 1333 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Eb.hoop. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Sims
[edit]Offprints as we know them did not exist in the nineteenth century. Someone affluent like Sims could have his writings reprinted, at his own expense, to give out. It would be really extraordinary if a medical journal contained the list of his honors that is on the title page. (I hope you don’t make me have to find the journal to document this.) Whoever published them, it is a lust he made himself. deisenbe (talk) 00:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- The original article wasn't hard to find: [1]. You're right that there the byline is just "J. Marion Sims, M.D. New York". I therefore accept your argument that the list of titles was provided by Sims himself. - Eb.hoop (talk) 00:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Eb.hoop. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]William Tecumseh Sherman Featured article review
[edit]I have nominated William Tecumseh Sherman for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:37, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Alejandro Jenkins for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alejandro Jenkins, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Jenkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Replaceable non-free use File:Tristancanc.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Tristancanc.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC)