Talk:Fruitafossor

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vfd

On 1 Apr 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Fruitafossor for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 04:14, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)

Earliest Relative

"it may have been the earliest known relative to the evolutionary line leading to Theria." - What does this mean? Isn't, say, Dimetrodon also a "relative to the evolutionary line leading to Theria" - and even earlier than fruitafossor? ErikHaugen (talk) 14:58, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Age

Fruitafossa is apparently known from a single specimen. If so, the 155.7-150.8 Ma is an indication of uncertainty and not a duration of existence. The lead sentence should be changed.

Dan Milton (casual reader) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.96.211.72 (talk) 04:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weight

The article says that Fruitafossor weighed 6 g, but wouldn't it rather be 60 g? Because if I type in "Fruitafossor" on google, all the pages say "15 cm long" and "chipmunk sized"... Karli999 (talk) 19:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]