Talk:Little Albert experiment

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives: 1

Merritte grave marker

@Acroterion: Not sure of the relevance of the Merritte grave marker placement here in the article, as there is no proof that he was the experimental subject, and, indeed, Barger is the most likely candidate to having been Little Albert. Either way, it is highly speculative and should probably be removed per CRYSTAL. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 20:19, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ps: I have my trout ready. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"}

Merritte is mentioned in the discussion, with appropriate context. Perhaps a picture is more emphasis than is needed. A German user asked me to get the image, and I ran across it again when I was going through uploads. Feel free to remove it, I have no strong views either way. Acroterion (talk) 22:44, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it best be removed for now. Thanks for the reply. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 10:51, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Far out speculation

This is pretty far out (for various reasons), but because it is a talk page I think I can mention it here.

I wonder if there is any chance that, if the baby was Merritte, if the hydrocephalus was caused by these experiments?

I am not a doctor, and I read the article on hydrocephalus, and I see that (1) it is not only a birth defect (it can develop later in life), and (2) it is usually attributed to physical causes.

I recognize two (probably very slim) possibilities: (1) that the vibrations from the hammer striking that bar behind the baby were enough of a physical stimulus to cause the hydrocephalus, or (2) the emotional reaction to the stress caused physical reactions (which, as we know, stress does have physical manifestations), and either the emotion or the physical reactions caused the hydrocephalus.

Rhkramer (talk) 14:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]