User talk:Andre Engels

Quadrivium

What's your source for "the quadrivium could be considered as the study of number: arithmetic was pure number, geometry was number in space, music number in time, and astronomy number in space and time."? It strikes me as a particular elegant characterization, and I'd like to trace it back to the original formulation.

Ken Mondschein 04:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC) (contact me by e-mailing mondschein-at-fordham.edu)

What's going on?

I note three vandalisms from your account, immediately followed by reversions. Did someone else use your computer, or were you trying to test our vandalism response?-gadfium 22:33, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Neither. I just felt in the mood to vandalize. And then I felt I had been silly. Then again, Wikipedia is a silly thing anyway, so maybe I should have kept them vandalized. - 81.70.91.207 15:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Robot attention to interwikis that are placed in templates

Hi! In a few wikipedias the interwikis of certain project pages, notably the village pumps, are put in templates to simplify the code of the project pages. For example,

• at fy:Wikipedy:Oerlis side interwikis are in fy:Berjocht:De kroech,
• at he:ויקיפדיה:מזנון interwikis are in he:תבנית:מזנון,
• at is:Wikipedia:Potturinn interwikis are in is:Snið:Potturinn, and
• at no:Wikipedia:Tinget interwikis are in no:Mal:Tinget-topp.

Do you know if, and how, the robots can be programmed not to put interwikis in those pages, but automatically put them in the respective templates, or must we clean up in each case? Is there some other, robot-related forum where such things could be discussed? (BTW, some users feel that interwikis should not be put in templates at all, because linking should be easy – especially for "newbies". But that's quite a different issue.) I'll watch your user talk, so you may reply here. Thanks. --Eddi (Talk) 11:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

They could be programmed that way, but I see no better way to do it than by specifying each and every such page by hand (ugly!). I'm not going to do it, I've had it with Wikipedia, and I've had it with the bot. Go to wikibots-l (just Google it or so). Farewell. - 81.70.91.207 15:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your assistance. :) Sorry for intruding. :| --Eddi (Talk) 18:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Germany is being replaced by a category

Hello! You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Germany page as living in or being associated with Germany. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, or one of the Bundesland-based subcategories, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Germany for instructions. --Angr (tɔk) 14:46, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

No, I should be off... I moved out of Germany a year and a half ago. - Andre Engels 12:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Canada

Just because I'm curious - why did you revert the Canada article to a version that apparently is from May 2005, without even using an edit summary? Sam Vimes 15:03, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning, I must have been asleep or something... I intended to revert a single previous edit rather than a whole bunch of them - and it seems that the edit I wanted to revert wasn't on the page in the first place. I must have hit 'save page' in the wrong window or something like that. - Andre Engels 07:54, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

I think I already know what happened: I saw the error on a Wikipedia mirror, and used the link from there to the article, but it linked to the old version that they had copied rather than the current one. I then corrected that old version, causing me to unintendedly revert all subsequent edits. How I missed the "You are editing an old version of the page" warning, I still do not know. - Andre Engels 08:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Ah, makes some kind of sense. Thanks for clearing it up :) Sam Vimes 08:49, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikiholism and Meta

In a good faith environment, changes are made because the Wikipedians on a Wikipedia want them, not because a single Wikipedian from another Wikipedia wants them. - Andre Engels 19:08, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

What are you trying to say? I do not like your attitude. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 19:39, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

hi

May I add that I find very peculiar that Cool Cat feels allowed to change these pages without consulting the local communities first, even re-reverting after he has been reverted in two occasions (es: and fr:), yet gets angry with his opponents for reverting him on other wikis than their own? I also find his remarks here and here to sound like he has very little feeling for community. "It should not bring a lot of stress - I did a lot of work on this, it should just be blanked - do what you want with the page, you're causing me unnecessary stress". As for Anthere threatening to block you: Doing an edit then reverting it does sound like trying to 'force' to me. Your mileage may vary, but just realize that in many non-English Wikipedias there is much resistance against (real or imagined) 'imperialism' from en:. Barging in and make changes because you like them when others don't is not going to increase your popularity.

Addition: The block threat was based on a message to me on the wikipedia-l list, see here and here. Anthere reacted here, apparently hearing of them for the first time and getting quite enraged. - Andre Engels 13:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

I dont care about my popularity or wikipolitics. I never had any popularity in the first place. I got harrased constantly by individuals unlike anyone else.

I have been reverted by same people interwiki even when I discussed it with the comunities on IRC and they said it was a good idea. Local comunities who liked the meta idea were also reverted. See th and ja wikipeida. I do not care what goes on wikipedia-l. I blanked to take comunities attention. Posting on talk pages no one looks at will not get anyones attention.

I will revert war on against french wikipedians on japanese wikipedia. If the japanese comunity decided they dont do meta then I would backed down as I did on Nl note that i did so with great disapointment.

never the less I thank you for posting liks to the mailing list. I did not even know about it prior.

--Cool Cat^Talk|@ 13:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

I also dont like you talking to me in 3rd person on my talk page. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 13:38, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

One key thing, my actions indended to make meta more multi lingual and less of an english only cabal and hence by nature was "anti-imperialist" --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 18:42, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Anti vandal script

What are you using to revert vandalism. WP has had a couple fairly big attacks in the last couple of days with a user replacing pages with an image. Do you have a script that I could use that would revert all pages with the said image / edit summary quickly, we had aprox a 400 edit vandalbot in the span of 5 min and a bout would be very very useful. Thanks Tawker 05:39, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia in Tetum

• Help building a Wikipedia in Tetum, the national language of East Timor. Give your contribution to the improvement of its test page -- Regards, 195.23.53.121 11:32, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Manuel de Sousa

Please check your WP:NA entry

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

1. If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
2. If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
3. Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 04:22, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Beiserebatedor.jpg

Hi,

I noticed the source web address you cited for Image:Beiserebatedor.jpg now gets a "page missing" error. Can you locate the source? The photo of course looks like a typical agency photo and unlikely to really be freely usable, hence my looking for the source. Thanks - Tempshill 19:42, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi - thanks for the answer - I copied and pasted that Portuguese phrase over to the page for support. Unfortunately an exact URL is required or eventually the photo will be deleted. Tempshill 18:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

The copyright status of photos you upload needs to be verifiable by other editors. Wikipedia:Verifiability is the related policy. If you don't provide an exact source - in the case of a website, meaning an exact URL - then it may not be possible for other editors to verify the copyright status, and your image might be tagged for deletion. I'm not going to tag it because I believe you, but others might not, and would be justified in tagging it. On your statement about self-taken photos, at present the statement that a photo is self-taken is enough. I can see how this is not verifiable, so my bet is that in 10 years the policy will have changed to something where they have to provide some proof that they themselves took the photo ... but I'm speculating about the future. Tempshill 22:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed undone by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 12:49, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

If you were more careful with your edits and did not just revert my reversion without considering my comments I would not have to waste my time by reverting again. Please play as part of the team. Xtra 13:17, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Whatsup?

Hi André,

Did I miss something? Or was your blanking of my user page accidental? You can always leave me a note on my user talk page... --Francis Schonken 15:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Loved your talk on the Ontological argument, should go in main text :) mr_happyhour

Apr 2006

Age of consent

Hi, just wondering what your thinking is behind removing the two articles from the Further reading section of Age of consent? I didn't add them myself, I did move them into Further reading from the main article, however. --Monotonehell 10:33, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't see them as being important to the subject of the page - at most they can function as source/evidence for a statement that sometimes persecution takes place for AOC where the perpetrator and 'victim' are later married. - Andre Engels 10:38, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

I was in two minds about them myself. They are as you say just two examples, but since we're discussing law on that page they can be seen as precendent or enforcement of precendent. So as I said, I stood on the fence and moved them from the article to the Further reading. These are the kinds of links that have been the subject of edit wars and I wouldn't be suprised if they pop up again in the future. lol cheers for your input --Monotonehell 14:58, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Long talk page

Greetings! Your talk page is getting a bit long in the tooth - please consider archiving your talk page (or ask me and I'll archive it for you). Cheers! BD2412 T 23:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

DO WHATEVER YOU FUCKING LIKE. I DON'T CARE. WHY DON'T YOU ALL JUST GO HOME AND SHUT UP? FUCKERS! - Andre Engels 23:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Wonderful! I shall take care of it for you, then. Have a cheerful day! BD2412 T 21:30, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Proposed Georgia Move

As a past participant in the discussion on how to handle the Georgia pages, I thought you might be interested to know that there's a new attempt to reach consensus on the matter being addressed at Talk:Georgia (country)#Requested_Move_-_July_2006. Please come by and share your thoughts to help form a consensus. --Vengeful Cynic 04:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Romanian Wikipedia bot flag removed

The Romanian community decided to remove the bot flag for your bot Robbot because it has not been used intensely for some time and has less edits. If you want to run back the bot sometime please re-request the bot flag approval at requests for robots. -Romihaitza 08:22, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Kite.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Kite.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Work getting backed up on Commons due to bureaucrats possibly on vacation.

I applied for a bot flag on Commons:Commons:Administrators but unfortunately, the other Bureaucrats appear to be away on summer vacations. This proposal has been on the list for than two weeks has 9-0 votes in favour. Sent a message to village pump requesting Bureaucrat action last week, but still nothing. The bot is mostly doing category maintenance at this time and further work is being held up because it is flooding the RC list (recent run made 60K edits) making RC useless to folks. I have voluntarily held off any further runs since it appeared folks really preferred that.

But there are a number of things that I need to have the Bot do. Could you take a look and give it a flag? -Mak Thorpe 00:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

BTW- Thanks very much for your work on the Python scripts in pywikepedia.

Interlingua interwiki sorting order

Why have you mandated a different interwiki sorting order for the Interlingua wikipedia? I personally disagree with it. -- Dissident (Talk) 11:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

your bot at ar wiki

Please check our Bot page. Your Bot could get blocked. --Tarawneh 16:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bibliotheek.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bibliotheek.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 11:12, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rigging8..png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rigging8..png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 18:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Pioneer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pioneer.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:20, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

bot @ sq wiki

Please, could you apply for a bot flag on sq wiki here. Bet_0

Link spam

Hi. May I ask you to please explain why you remove the external links as "link spam" from articles like Dmytro Horbachov, Alexander Bogomazov, and others? I do noth think they are link spam, as they are examples of the artist's works. —dmytro/s-ko/ 02:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

RE: Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars

Hi I am message you because you contributed a section to Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars

• Help other wikipedians enjoy Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars even more

Thanks, Travb (talk) 12:17, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

A request for assistance

Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 02:50 3 January 2007 (UTC).

Image:Jigsaw pieces.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jigsaw pieces.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. cohesion 17:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Skunk.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Skunk.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 12:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Robbot

Your robot falsely removed assassination interwiki link to 'simple english' wiki. Please check so this thing doesn't happen. Thanks you. MadMaxDog 05:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually looking at the simple english linked article finds that murder and assassination are two 'articles' on one page. Not sure if that is their style, but that is why I said your removal was wrong. MadMaxDog 09:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Nozomsite

geocities.com/nozomsite Is a real and related website with real data, please remove it from the blacklist, thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 196.202.46.13 (talk) 01:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC).

I agree that the site is real and may on some pages be related, but I also agree that it has been heavily spammed onto Wikipedia pages. Block kept. - Andre Engels 09:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

And if it is related, why you have considered it a spam. By the way, it has two links in the human edited web directory DMOZ, just search for Nozomsite.(196.202.46.13 04:26, 9 February 2007 (UTC))

Not all related links are wanted on Wikipedia, far from it. And making such links to the same site from many articles is considered spam. Try complaining with someone else, I won't change my mind. Not based on your arguments at least. - Andre Engels 08:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

"Try complaining with someone else", You can be polite a little bit more mr. admin, you are disappointed. (196.202.46.13 17:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC))

Yiddish wikipedia request from your bot

First of all we thank u for putting all the interwikis first in English then in second Hebrew, we would like to organize deutsch-german to be the third since our Yiddish languge originates from German, and this will help allot to term articles and wording according to its parent language after comparing the English and Hebrew options which is intertwined in modern Yiddish. thanks. also if you can organize this that other bots should note it as well. thanks. --yidi 17:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)yi:באנוצער:יודל

Possibly unfree Image:Jigsaw pieces.jpg

An image that you uploaded from stock.xchng or altered, Image:Jigsaw pieces.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images#SXC_images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 01:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Christoph Metzelder

Your bot takes zh:克里斯托弗·梅策爾德 off of the Christoph Metzelder page. What exactly is wrong with it? Kingjeff 18:12, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

It is a problem with the traditional/simplified orthography. If you go to the page 克里斯托弗·梅策爾德 on zh:, you get to 克里斯托弗·梅策尔德. However, the bot uses Special:Export, and on Special:Export, such an alternative orthography does not give a text, so the bot thought the page did not exist. I have now had the bot change the link to 'standard' orthography, so the link will not be removed by bots any more. - Andre Engels 19:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Minneapolis

		The Original Barnstar
		To Andre Engels, on the occasion of Minneapolis, Minnesota reaching featured article. -Susanlesch 21:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Coat of arms

Thank you very much for your help. --EncycloPetey 18:57, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Robert Lucas

A tag has been placed on Robert Lucas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Agamemnon2 08:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

in dem Artikel über die Grönländische Wirtschaft (Wikipedia on English)

...gibt es Folgendes:

"Oil - consumption:

0 bbl/day (2004 est.)

Oil - consumption:

3,860 bbl/day (2004 est.)"

So, what is with the oil-consumption in this region?It seems to me, that one of them is oil-production. Uuu87 10:44, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Uuu87 11:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help

Thanks for reverting vandalism on Larrys Creek on October 19. I appreciate your help keeping the article presentable while it was Today's Featured Article very much, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 18:55, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Please get a bot flag at bpy@wiki

Dear Andre Engels or Robbot,

Bishnupriya Manipuri Wiki likes to thank you for your hard work. Your bot makes a huge edit everyday, so it is hard for us to keep track for recent changes. To solve this problem we would like to request you to have a bot flag. Please request your bot here. Visit the local page first for your bot request. Since we do not have a bureaucrat please go to the m:Requests_for_bot_status for bureaucrat's aproval. Thanks--Usingha (talk) 03:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

To return the sysop rights

Hi Andre,

I am an administrator on Marathi Wikipedia.

I would like to return the sysop rights since I would not be able to give time for this responsibility.

I am requesting you because you had granted me those rights three years ago.

I hope somebody who is more active than me can make justice with it.

I shall also drop a message to Marathi Wikipedia community on its village-pump equivalent page.

Thanks for your time.

Harshal (talk) 14:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Twat

After I saw your user page saying "I am a twat", we spent a good two minutes discussing it in IRC (trying it figure out if you used the wrong word) before I realized it was vandalism. Raul654 (talk) 07:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Miranda

A tag has been placed on Miranda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. DiligentTerrier ^{and friends} 16:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

- Just Wanted To Know

Hello Andre,

My name is Jonathon and I like to help out a lot and recently I noticed a lot of very interesting and important information has not been added to Wikipedia. So, I was wondering if there was ANY way that I could contribute to the site with my knowledge or spare time. Monday-Friday I am usually completely free from 2:15pm to roughly 12:00M. I don't really do much at all during the week unless its a holiday so I was hoping there would be something for me to do. I would say I am rather qualified for editing or moderating as I have been a MIRC Moderator before, this was a ways back, but I Moderated there. I am very knowledgeable of a vast amount of topics and I have access to countless encyclopedias and what some might call historical documents (not the originals of course, just written copies, but I am sure I could find some carbon or original copies at the Library or Town Hall). I am also great with grammar and spelling as you can probably tell by now. Though I am not as advanced as some of my entire-site-making friends I have practices HTML Codes as well.

Like I said I have a LOT of free time on my hands and I am always willing to help out a good cause and this site which I imagine is here to inform the world in a safe and slightly interactive (editable) environment. So if you find something that I might be able to assist with or there are any non-profit (assuming they all are :P ) jobs on the site I would be happy to take them on.

Sincerely,

John006a (talk) 02:02, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Jonathon Andrews

Proposed deletion of Iris magazine

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Iris magazine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Papa November (talk) 18:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Sheep.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sheep.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -Nard 00:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Sheep.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sheep.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -Nard 18:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

IP blocked

Dear Andre,

This is Ekain Lexartza, a technology area teacher at Laudio High School (Basque Country), as well as a recently registered wikimedia user (ekain.lexartza). As a school activity, I have recently started to translate, with my students, technology related articles to Basque language. The fact is that, althought I am perfectly able to do so, my students cannot even register, because you have blocked our IP (212.142.143.114. Curiously, they can register and work in Spanish, but not in Basque.

I would like to know when and why exactly has our IP been blocked, and if there is one, what the solution can be.

Thanks for your time!

Ekain Lexartza —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.142.143.114 (talk) 07:31, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

The 'when' is on 25 September. The 'why' is because there is a long history of detrimentous changes by your students. On http://eu.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aparteko:Log&type=block&page=Lankide%3A212.142.143.114 you find a list of all blockings of the ip, see also Lankide eztabaida:212.142.143.114. On 23 September they had been blocked for one day by TXiKi after submitting an article "L'Enfant Sauvage" with as its text "UEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE IJOS DE PUTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA MARICONESSSSSSSSSSSS". On the 25th I saw the ip return with "Faxa ez dakit zer den!!! Horrexegatik ari natzaizue galdetzen!!!" for the article "Faxa" and "aaaahhh!!" for the article "Memory stick". Because of the long ranging history of nonsense articles and other vandalism from your ip address, I then decided to block it for a longer time. I will now unblock the ip, but please ask your students that if they want to post material that is not a wikipedia article to do it on Wikipedia:Proba orria and not in the article namespace, because subsequent misconstrued edits will likely lead to a new ban. And yes, the ban was on the Basque Wikipedia, not on the whole, so they should have been able to edit on the Spanish Wikipedia or any other language. - Andre Engels (talk) 08:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:Islamkarimov.jpg

Image:Islamkarimov.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Islamkarimov Uz.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Islamkarimov Uz.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:57, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Name templates

Hi, I note that you removed {{given name}} from a few articles about names, with the comment that it was not a disambiguation page. It seems that your argument is with the text contained within the template. Feel free to take this up on the template's talk page, or at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anthroponymy. Meanwhile, I have restored the template to the articles, as it is the correct template to include on a Name article.

Given your interest in articles about names, you would be very welcome to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Anthroponymy. There is plenty of work to do! - Fayenatic (talk) 21:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Actually, my objection was mostly based on their inclusion on MediaWiki:Disambiguationspage. - Andre Engels (talk) 23:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Columbusroutes.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Columbusroutes.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:Gerhard_Schroeder.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gerhard_Schroeder.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of TopicMaps

I have nominated TopicMaps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Blacksmith (comics)

Doesn't seem to be a hoax, check the link at the bottom. The character exists, but I'm not sure if they're notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:08, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Rfd nom

Before nominating a talk page redirect for deletion, check to see if after the page move a disambiguation page has been created at the article. If so, just remove the talkpage redirect and replace with {{DisambigProject}}. Presto, problem solved. If no dab is there, you can do {{db-g6}}, it's speedy bait. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 15:19, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Hmmm... I went through Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion first, but it didn't look to me like G6 applied... As for the other possibility - I dislike throwing templates on a page or talk page and then pretending I did something useful. - Andre Engels (talk) 16:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Interwiki links

I left a couple of messages for you on the bot talk page. Your speedy attention would be most appreciated. Ohconfucius (talk) 05:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Hey fellow old-timer...

Is something wrong? Manning (talk) 02:46, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Yeah. It seems you're an administrator, so maybe you recognize it a bit... I am one on the Dutch Wikipedia, and we got a remark criticizing us for not blocking someone. However, I know for sure that had someone blocked him, that would have been criticized too, including calls to depose him. We are supposed to take action against people, yet are not allowed to do so. How weird does it get?

But deeper down I guess it's irritation about Wikipedia not working the way it should. It's supposed to work in such a way that if you don't agree about something, you discuss and find a compromise that both can agree with (in the end, that is the essence of NPOV). In actuality, such a thing is rare. If there is a conflict, what usually happens is that the person with the longest breath wins - either by silently reverting to their own version without discussion, or by keeping discussing until the other party gives up. And even if you manage to get into a discussion, it is easy enough to inject your own POV in 10 other pages in the time it costs the others to discuss its removal on one. The Wikipedia system works well if everyone is actually working towards neutrality. Many do, but the number who don't are high enough to disrupt everything. And our methods of dealing with them are at best inefficient, more often ineffective or non-existent. - Andre Engels (talk) 06:17, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey Andre - you seem to have forgotten me - we used to work together back in the EARLY, EARLY days of Wikipedia (like in 2001). Anyway I remembered you :)

Regardless, yes everything you are saying is true. It is the perennial dilemma of running in a supposed democratic framework. The only answer is to try to remain true to yourself and your principles. If you feel you did the right thing, then you probably did.

The "noise" factor can be overwhelming at times. The best bet is simply to ignore it. Tune it out. You will be criticised no matter what you do. But remember that nothing about Wikipedia is worth getting upset over. It's just a website. Cheers Manning (talk) 06:26, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

No, to be honest I don't remember, but it doesn't surprise me either - as you write, everyone knew each other in that time, and almost everyone from that time worked together (I can remember that back then I would at the end of the day look what others had been doing on Wikipedia, and sometimes making small corrections and additions - all in an hour or so). Did I do the right thing? I don't know. I didn't do anything, in fact... But I think Wikipedia is more than just a website. I love it. I hate it. And really, what happened here is just a little issue. I have done much worse over past conflicts... - Andre Engels (talk) 07:27, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Garmin

Please don't add nonsense to articles as you did in this edit. ThanksAdambro (talk) 18:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. MBisanz ^talk 01:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Distributed Proofreaders

Your summary of PGDP workflow is great, what about sharing it and putting it in the article? Thank you, Nemo 07:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Garmin

Hey there. I would ask you not do that again. It is disruptive to our project. Consider this a warning.--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 16:24, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

I dunno what's up, but please try to be more polite and less pointy :( 16:26, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

That's not pointy it is the truth. I'm not going to template a regular, and Andre knows better.--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 16:29, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, you're right. I shouldn't do that kind of thing, but I'm too emotional for my own good at times. - Andre Engels (talk) 17:00, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Looks like fail indentation and fail signing by me, it was meant to be addressed at Andre not you. Sorry for the mess up. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

It's alright. Thanks Andre. If your emotions take the better of you, I suggest taking a break, stepping back, and coming back with a calm and open mind. Thanks all!--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 18:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

IP check

Hoi Andre, Dit ben ik niet, sorry. http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciaal:Bijdragen/94.210.197.169 Die plakbandrolletje evenmin. Ik begrijp dat het voor jullie ondoenlijk is om alles correct en foutloos uit te zoeken en je hebt mij verder niet met de verkeerde blokkades. Ik heb met jouw handelen als uitvoerder geen problemen, dus wijs je enkel op foutjes, omdat nu onschuldigen geblokkeerd worden op basis van jullie te ruwe controles. Hoe meer mensen verkeerd geblokkeerd worden, hoe meer weerzin er zal ontstaan tegen Wikipedia bij toevallige gebruikers die dit overkomt. Dat kun je niet willen, lijkt me. Met vriendelijke gr, 94.210.227.199 (talk) 19:06, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Request for comment

This message is being sent to you because you have previously edited the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) page. There is currently a discussion that may result in a significant change to the policy of this page. Specifically, a consensus is being sought on if the policies of WP:UCN and WP:EN continues to be working policies for naming biographical articles, or if such policies have been replaced by a new status quo. This discussion is on-going at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English), and your comments would be appreciated. Dolovis (talk) 16:43, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

selamatkan aku

Hello, are you steward? Help me! Because I was blocked there (accusation) canvassing at Indonesian Wikipedia. And lately I've never done anything like that. Just look list contribution at there. Please (if possible) revoked the block status.

Oh ya, I also ask to release the SockPuppet I was there named id:User: Erik Evermtus at Indonesian Wikipedia because this account will be used as a substitute if the main account stolen by others such as id:User:Kenrick95Sock. Thank you --Erik Evrest (talk) 04:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Stewards have the task to support communities, not to go against community decisions on the request of single persons. If you want to be unblocked on the Indonesian Wikipedia, it is the sysops and other users from the Indonesian Wikipedia that you should be contacting, not me or other Stewards. - Andre Engels (talk) 10:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

But, that means the same as abuse of authority. So blocking is feasible status revoked and the blocker can be removed his admin status --Erik Evrest (talk) 11:45, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

I cannot judge from your few lines whether or not you have been blocked for good reason; however, if you are unable to find sysops or regulars on the Indonesian wiki who agree with you, you probably have been. It would definitely mean that I am not in a position to just go against their decision based on nothing more than a statement from you. - Andre Engels (talk) 08:56, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Feedback Dashboard task force

Hi Andre Engels,

I noticed you replied to some feedback from the new Feedback Dashboard feature – you might be interested in the task force Steven Walling and I just created for this purpose: Wikipedia:Feedback Dashboard. Thanks for diving in on your own and helping the newbies, and I hope you'll sign up! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:14, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation, but I was just passing by the dashboard more or less accidentily. I am hoping to get the Moodbar implemented on the Dutch Wikipedia, where I spent most of my wiki time nowadays, for this reason though. - Andre Engels (talk) 08:29, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

• Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi ^{t | c} 17:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Andre,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, — Hex (❝?!❞) 02:34, 11 November 2012 (UTC).

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikidata is here; please disable any interwiki bots on the English Wikipedia

Hi!

Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Going forward, Wikidata will manage interwiki links. Further information: m:Wikidata/Deployment Questions and <https://blog.wikimedia.de/?p=13892>.

Important note: Bots that continue to add, remove, or update interwiki links on the English Wikipedia may be blocked from editing after Saturday, February 16, 2013.

If you are running pywikipedia's interwiki.py, please update to pyrev:11073 which will automatically prevent your bot from updating links on this wiki.

If you have any questions, please ask at the bot owners' noticeboard. Thank you for your past work maintaining interwiki links. It has been very appreciated and we're looking forward to an even brighter future with Wikidata. Legoktm (talk) 10:20, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Geography of the Republic of Ireland listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Geography of the Republic of Ireland. Since you had some involvement with the Geography of the Republic of Ireland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 19:25, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Matthijs Quast

Hi there, I'm thinking of writing a small biography of Matthijs Quast. He had a very interesting journey and I think there's too little information about him. There are not many sources to use, but I noticed you wrote a bit about him and I wanted to ask if you can help me. The link to your source "Andre Engels: Matthijs Quast" in the wikipedia article about Quast doesn't work. Could you help me with any information or sources? Thank You! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.50.159.32 (talk) 10:09, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

My sources are the two Dutch-language books mentioned in the references. Later I found some more references:

P: Verseput, J. (ed.): De reis van Matthijs Hendriksz Quast en Abel Jansz. Tasman ter ontdekking van de Goud- en Zilvereilanden. (The Hague 1954)

Siebold, H. von: "La decouverte des iles Bonin par des navigateurs hollandais en 1639." L'Exploration 12 (1881)

I think I still have the books by Roeper and Wildeman and Slot in my possession, as well as Raymond John Howgego's Encyclopedia of Exploration and a number of other books on these subjects, so if you give some more information about what information it is that you want, I might be of help.

As you notice, I don't come by here very often any more. You can react at my Dutch user talk page or send me an email (andreengels at gmail dot com) if you want faster communication. - Andre Engels (talk) 12:14, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Andre,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. Since you are the first who wrote on my talk page 8 December 2002 I want to invite you to the Ten Year Society.

Best regards, Dan Koehl (talk) 18:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

The Beatles Invite

	Hi! I've seen you around on The Beatles' articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Beatles, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Beatles on Wikipedia? Please feel free to join us.
Abbey Road... You're not in this picture... yet! Todo list:

Merger discussion for Muzzle (firearms)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Muzzle (firearms), has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Lightbreather (talk) 19:50, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Other games listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Other games. Since you had some involvement with the Other games redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:57, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Trumps listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trumps. Since you had some involvement with the Trumps redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 10:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Andre Engels. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Andre Engels. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Andre Engels

(Charles R. Knight, 1922)

Thank you for all you did for this project in 2016, Andre Engels. May your house be safe, and may you and those having the privilege of your company enjoy good health in a Happy New Year 2017! Kind regards, Lotje (talk) 05:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC) Pass on! Send this greeting by adding {{subst:User:Sam Sailor/Templates/HappyNewYear}} to user talk pages. Automatic level-2 heading and auto-signing included.

Help with updating Spider taxonomy

		The Minor Barnstar
		Hey, thanks for looking after the spider genera for me. It sounds like this isn't the first correction you've made and I know I've made plenty of mistakes in the attempt to update Wikipedia's knowledge of spider taxonomy, so thanks for taking the time to fix my obvious errors. Even the smallest of edits can be the most important, even if they are often overlooked, so thanks for the help and keep up the good work! Sesamehoneytart 19:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Andre Engels. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Algorithms (journal) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Algorithms (journal) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algorithms (journal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RileyBugz^{私に叫ぼう}_私の編集 02:09, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andre Engels. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andre Engels. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

20th century/Life expectancy listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 20th century/Life expectancy. Since you had some involvement with the 20th century/Life expectancy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:43, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Pan

Hi! I just read something you did when looking at the history, so I peeked to see if you are active and to mention that I linked that version in a current discussion. Shorter, but it is still accurate and useful, nice work. cygnis insignis 20:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Andre Engels,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 18:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

General

Hello and greeting, you can remove the deletion tags at the V. Ganabatiran article because I have deleted non-Malay content there and replaced with the original Malay content. Thank you.-Fandi89 (talk) 11:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pike (programming language)

The article Pike (programming language) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a Google Books and Google Scholar searches beyond passing mentions and affiliated sources. No suitable redirect targets.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 05:37, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

"Employment Pathways for Interns and Co-ops" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Employment Pathways for Interns and Co-ops. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 17#Employment Pathways for Interns and Co-ops until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

"Bovine" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bovine and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 17#Bovine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:17, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for POTD

Hi Andre Engels,

This is to let you know that File:Fabritius-vink.jpg, a featured picture you uploaded, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for August 23, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-08-23. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.9% of all FPs} 11:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

The Goldfinch is an oil-on-panel painting by the Dutch Golden Age artist Carel Fabritius of a life-sized chained goldfinch. Signed and dated 1654, it is now in the collection of the Mauritshuis in The Hague, Netherlands. The work is a trompe-l'œil painting that was once part of a larger structure, perhaps a window jamb or a protective cover. It is possible that the work was in Fabritius's studio in Delft at the time of a large gunpowder explosion on 12 October 1654 that killed him and destroyed much of the city. A common and colourful bird with a pleasant song, the goldfinch was a popular pet, and could be taught simple tricks including lifting a thimble-sized bucket of water. It was reputedly a bringer of good health, and was used in Italian Renaissance painting as a symbol of Christian redemption and the Passion of Jesus. The Goldfinch is unusual for the Dutch Golden Age painting period in the simplicity of its composition and use of illusionary techniques. Following the death of its creator, it was lost for more than two centuries before its rediscovery in Brussels.

Painting credit: Carel Fabritius

Recently featured:

• Wells Cathedral
• Argentine real
• Jaguar

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ITN archives

Hi. I hope you are doing well. I am glad to tell you that Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives are now fully available, with all the vandalism/disruptive edits removed. While creating the bot for the archival process, I went through a lot of the older posts, you are one of the editors whose name popped quite often in ITN in "back in the day", so I personally wanted to let you know about the archives its nice to see that you are still active! —usernamekiran (talk) 22:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for United Nations

United Nations has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)