User talk:Robert Happelberg

Hello Robert, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have a lot of fun here. There are lots of resources around to help guide you. be sure to check out:

If you want add any images check out:

If you need any help try:

Wikipedia:Help
Village pump
Or ask me at my talk page User_talk:Theresa knott

Don't be afraid of making the odd mistake, there are any number of others eagerly waiting for a chance to correct it!

Hi. I'm not sure of the benefit of adding supposed ages of biblical figures to number pages such as Fifty-two. -- Tarquin 16:17, 5 Jan 2004 (UTC)

RFNs

I got a Roman Friedman# for you: LXXVIII = ( XV - II ) * ( L / X + I ) You can credit me as [PF] if you like. PrimeFan 16:04, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

These are cheesy derivations, but I didn't see them on your list, so I'm letting you know about them: CXXXIV = XV * (XC/X) - I, similar thing for 136. Anton Mravcek 23:35, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

In your user page you write "I mentioned applying the concept of Friedman numbers to Erich Friedman." Surely you meant "I mentioned to Erich Friedman about applying the concept of Friedman numbers to Roman numerals."? 141.217.41.218 23:15, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the correction, 141.217.41.218. And thanks Anton for the RFNs. Robert Happelberg 20:40, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

LXXXVIII=(X-II)*(X+I^LXV)
CXXXVIII=((C-XXX)-I^V)*II
CLXXXVII=(CX/X)*XVII 141.217.41.208 15:27, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like the first two, because they exponentiate I, and the last one is missing the L in the expression. Robert Happelberg 20:28, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[Sic]

Oops. My apologies, you're entirely right about [The South End]. I can only plea a momentary lapse of concentration, as it's pretty obviously meant to be a misspelling given the context. Cmdrjameson 23:20, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The South End

No sorry. I just reverted a vandalism on the article. :) Inter\^Echo 22:54, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare overwiki game

Bob, I challenge you to add more links to this Shakespeare excerpt.

To be, or not to be - that is the question:
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them. To die- to sleep-
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heartache, and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to. 'Tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish'd. To die - to sleep.
To sleep- perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub!
For in that sleep of death what dreams may come
When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,
Must give us pause. There's the respect
That makes calamity of so long life.
For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
Th' oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely,
The pangs of despis'd love, the law's delay,
The insolence of office, and the spurns
That patient merit of th' unworthy takes,
When he himself might his quietus make
With a bare bodkin? Who would these fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death-
The undiscover'd country, from whose bourn
No traveller returns- puzzles the will,
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all,
And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought,
And enterprises of great pith and moment
With this regard their currents turn awry
And lose the name of action.- Soft you now!
The fair Ophelia!-Nymph, in thy orisons
Be all my sins rememb'red.
--Hamlet, in William Shakespeare's Hamlet

Your edit of 300 (number)

Regretfully had some side effects: [1]. Can you see to that? -- Egil 21:13, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Way ahead of you. Robert Happelberg 21:15, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Thanks. And I suddenly realized why telephone became teleph ;-) -- Egil 21:22, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stewielocks and the Three Griffins

See my comments here. I think it'll end up gone again....and in the not too distant future either. We'll take care of it. Rx StrangeLove 03:40, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Films about musicians

Hi, and Happy New Year. Some other films about real musicians/composers are:

Song Without End (Liszt)
A Song to Remember (Chopin)
The Magnificent Rebel (Beethoven)
None But the Lonely Heart (not the 1944 Cary Grant film), and The Music Lovers (1971) (both about Tchaikovsky)
The Magic Bow (Paganini)
Rhapsody in Blue (Gershwin)
The Great Waltz (1938 and 1972 versions; Johann Strauss II)
Song of Love (1947), about Brahms' infatuation with Clara Schumann while he was staying with Clara and Robert; it starred Katharine Hepburn as Clara Schumann and Robert Walker as Brahms
Death in Venice (marginal; the character Aschenbach was in some ways modelled on Mahler, and the Adagietto from his 5th Symphony is played throughout; but Mahler was not sexually interested in young men, to my knowledge)
probably dozens of others. I'll update u as they come to me. Cheers JackofOz 23:39, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the list, gives me something to put on my Netflix queue. I'll also add them to the list I have on my user page. Robert Happelberg 20:00, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the acknowledgment. JackofOz 20:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robert. How could we forget the inimitable Ken Russell, who, as well as doing Mahler and The Music Lovers, has also made either feature films or documentaries about: Bartok, Bax, Bruckner, Debussy, Georges Delerue, Delius ('Song of Summer'), Elgar (1962 wonderful; 2002 godawful), Gordon Jacob, Liszt, Martinů, Prokofiev, Richard Strauss ('Dance of the Seven Veils'), and Vaughan Williams. IMDB has all the details.

I also remember the movie 'Nijinsky' which had an actor playing Stravinsky. Cheers JackofOz 03:47, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me about Ken Russell. I'll probably put the Elgar 2002 at the end of my Netflix list, but at least I have to give it credit for having an interesting title (Fantasy of a Composer on a Bicycle). IMDB lists The Diaries of Vaslav Nijinsky (2001) which has a part for Diaghilev but apparently not for Stravinsky. Robert Happelberg 20:58, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Math and Proof movie

I watched Proof. It's more about the psychological state of mathematicians than it is about actual mathematics. Scenes in the movie and DVD menu screens show a lot of intimidating-looking mathematical formulas fleeting by, but the dialogue contains very little beyond high school algebra. The bit about 33 1/4 years containing 1729 weeks was mildly interesting. I commented on the Sophie Germain prime mentioned in the movie in the talk page of the article about the movie. PrimeFan 20:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

10061092961

Didn't you know? It's the smallest number that can be written in 17 fully different (i.e. mutually disjoint) ways as the sum of 17 squares of prime numbers. No, I'm kidding, and I was somewhat facetious, but I'm fairly sure that given enough time (a whole lot) and a good generator of potential interesting looking properties, for a number this big you'll hit sooner or later (make that: later) on some property that makes you say "wow" (the first few times around). It is actually remarkable that this number can be written with only five different decimal digits; the vast majority of numbers need all ten. It is also somewhat implausible that we have the factorization 10061092961 = 100297 × 100313, where all three numbers start of with 100. And the number was not chosen arbitrarily, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10061092961. --Lambiam ^Talk 17:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Come and See

What commentary section were you talking about in the edit's description? -- Jokes Free4Me 10:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A commentary section that the article doesn't currently have but maybe it ought to have. The way I see it, statements like

"There is no closure - even after all of the horrible things that the protagonist has witnessed, he is not given any reprieve. It is implied that the war will go on forever."

don't belong in the plot summary, which ought to strive to be nothing more than a simple rendition of the plot which aids in comprehension of the cultural significance of the film. Robert Happelberg 22:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A small request

Before posting anything to The South End error log in the Talk page of the article, I would like to request that you please e-mail them about it first and wait at least a week. If you don't get a reply, then go ahead and post it. Thank you. Del arte 17:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chaike Grossman

Robert, I don't understand your edit summary and comment about the Hebrew spelling of the subject's name. Isn't it standard Wikipedia practice to include the appropriate language version of a name for subjects (as in this case) notable in a non-English speaking country? I'd appreciate your elucidating this point. I would support including it also because the Latin-letter transcription of her name is only an approximation (see Discussion), and readers of Hebrew will appreciate the information provided by the spelling. -- Thanks, Deborahjay 00:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Answered at your talk page.

Anne Frank statue

Hi Robert, I found a link here [2] attributing the work to a Dutch artist, Mari Andriessen, and I have updated the image description page with this information. Rossrs 00:40, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Franz Carl Weiskopf

I did notice that glitch myself. I only stubbed the article accordingly and it was you who created it. I let it be as it seemed a once off occurence. There's no signs of any other widespread problems with timestamps that I'm aware of. I guess a developer would be able to correct the problem if you wish for your edit to be attributed correctly. -- Longhair 23:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

confusion

well you dont seem to have a complete understanding of the situation, as it was discussed by wikipedia members who were going about cleaning things to determine the right order for categories, and it was decided in a group that it would be alphabetical. I dont see why people are so insistent on the notes being first anyways...if you are going to keep this format, then you need to follow through with it on all 100 or so episodes and not just the 20 or so you did. You could also form a discussion to get a standardized format settled for good if you want to be productive. Grande13 22:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Newsletter

The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Newsletter

The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Films Newsletter

The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 06:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films February Newsletter

The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 23:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March WP:FILMS Newsletter

The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by Cbrown1023 talk 00:42, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 22:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 08:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 19:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 13:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films roll call

Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the Active Members list. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

Also, elections for Project Coordinators are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators. Thanks and happy editing!

An automatic notification by BrownBot 01:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter

The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 23:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When You Wish Upon a Weinstein

I've never before seen one of those Cultural references sections turned into readable prose. Great work! / edg ☺ ★ 22:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rehearsal Letters

I'm not qualified to offer additions to the content of the [Rehearsal Letter] page, but the musical term is ambiguous in a layman context. Imagine someone seeing the term and thinking that Beethoven left some kind of parchment "Stick-It" note regarding the angle of the conductor's baton as he leads the Ninth Symphony. :)

The article is well-worth the clarification. And I couldn't master the first movement of the Moonlight Sonata without knowing what double sharps and flats were, either. MMetro 00:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at your talk page. Robert Happelberg 22:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a graphic will do wonders-- the Mozart would be a great example. Might I suggest adding extra annotation that can be read when clicking for the full size graphic? Sometimes, I find a useful nugget of information that either isn't in the main piece, or it's just more useful with the full size pic. MMetro 04:01, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at your talk page. Robert Happelberg 23:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The content is definitely public domain, although the font and extraneous notations might not be. Kind of like a Penguin Book of a Shakespearean play. If you generate your own transcription, you could use that, and focus on a section that highlights one or more rehearsal letters, instead of being stuck with the way the publisher arranges the music for you. MMetro 01:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mostro withKnife.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mostro withKnife.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your list of Movies

How have you been? I like your lists. I was thinking that you could actually create categories for your list, so that all one had to do was tag the entries for the movies. In a way, it would be a list, and I don't think that people get as upset over categories as they do about articles they consider dubious. PS You forgot Shine. MMetro (talk) 07:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There was another movie, with a title like Metamorpho, which involved a woman who discovers that her real Dad is a jazz musician, British, I think, and as a result she learns about jazz. I wish I remebered the name, I used to love that movie when it aired on CBC late night. Let me know if you have any leads, now or later. MMetro (talk) 04:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:09, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

template

Ya, 99% of the time my templating is legitimate, mostly for vandalism. CTJF83Talk 20:44, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ya....not sure what you're talking about, but don't template me! CTJF83Talk 20:58, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well good thing I'm not bound by the "laws" of "jesus". Leave my talk page alone unless you have other matters to concern me with. CTJF83Talk 21:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[-unindent-] This note is for Robert Happleburg: I noticed your comments on CTJF83's talk page. this appears to be uncivil and could very reasonably be taken as a personal attack. It would be hard to call that "constructive criticism."

I have no problem with you or your editing, but I would suggest, as an outside observer, that you would be better off not to do things towards other editors that seem nasty, as your comments on CTJF83's user page did. Wikipedia is a community, and it's best to make an effort to get along nicely with your fellow editors, even if you don't like something they've done or are doing.

Remember, you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. Have a nice day! Non Curat Lex (talk) 22:52, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I find it interesting that you misspelled my name as if you had heard it on the phone, rather than seen it on webpage a few times. Not a big deal.

CTJF83 baited me and I bit. I'm human, I make mistakes. For that moment before I realized what had happened, I understood how Slappywag felt. But then I realized I had fallen victim to a very sophisticated mind game.

Paying lip service to civility while simultaneously using it to attack others... that is very disturbing, and I fear only the tip of the iceburg [sic]. Robert Happelberg (talk) 21:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note, that you make mistakes, as I'm assure Non Curat Lex did in misspelling your name, it is just a simple typo! CTJF83Talk

In the future, keep your religious views to yourself, and cite Wikipedia examples CTJF83Talk 02:17, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How can you be sure Christianity is my religious view? Are you sure Wikipedia doesn't have an equivalent to the 'golden rule' ("do unto others...")? Even Satanism does. Robert Happelberg (talk) 21:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bob does and he did. But if ctjf83 actually read stuff rahter than try to skim it after he presses delete, maybe he'd actually know that. Slappywag42 (talk) 14:31, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Happleberg - First, I apologize for the typo; I will try not to misspell your name. For the record, I don't condone malicious or underhanded use of civility guidelines; I see it all the time in my line of work, and it's just obnoxious. (I also believe in the golden rule, for secular, nonsacred reasons). I don't think CTJF is manipulating you. I think CTJF seems like a good editor. So do you. So, if there is a problem I am missing here, I am sorry. Is there anything I can do to help make the situation better so that we can avoid conflict or deal with it constructively? Non Curat Lex (talk) 19:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SYN=OR

Please note the WP:SYN is a specific type of WP:OR, so yes indeed they can be the same thing. Please remove your edit or be inviolation of [[WP:#rr]]. -- The Red Pen of Doom 12:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What happens if I'm too busy with my day job and neglect to answer for three days? Robert Happelberg (talk) 21:55, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

After investigating a report at Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/PrimeFan, I have come to the conclusion that this account, along with a large number of other accounts, are all being operated by the same person as abusive sockpuppets. Operating multiple accounts is not permitted when they are used to edit the same articles and debates. However, due to the nature of the IP addresses involved, it is possible that some of these users have coincidentally shared a computer or IP address. If this is the case, you may request to be unblocked by emailing the blocking admin or the unblock mailing list with your official University email address. This is to prevent one person from spoofing the admins with multiple free throwaway email accounts such as gmail or yahoomail. (Your email address will not be stored or used other than for verification.) If this is a misunderstanding I apologize in advance, and your account will be unblocked as soon as you provide proof that you are a separate individual. Be advised two checkusers examined this case and agreed on the results. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mostro withKnife.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mostro withKnife.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Associate Bob Cutty.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Associate Bob Cutty.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Associate Laurel Ayres.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Associate Laurel Ayres.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:00, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Przypadek Birra Slika.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Przypadek Birra Slika.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:TheSouthEndFrontPageNov4.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:TheSouthEndFrontPageNov4.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:12, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MetroTimesFeb1Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MetroTimesFeb1Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MetroTimesFeb1Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MetroTimesFeb1Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of EoLA

The article EoLA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, no indication of notability of this event. No significant sources appear when searching the name of this event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 01:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]