This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
The last sentence does not make any sense to me. What is meant ?
I thought it was confusing, too, until I realized that there were two different antipopes called Benedict XIV. The sentence still contained an error, though. - Nat Krause 11:14, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Yes, this is a hoax. Antipopes B. XV & B. XVI never existed. Yann 11:56, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Well, what is your evidence for this claim? - Nat Krause 13:30, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Is there any evidence for the second Benedict XIV? The standard sources (The Oxford Dictionary of Popes, The Catholic Encyclopedia, the Liber Pontificalis) are silent about him, the source seems to be a novel, and, most importantly, it makes no sense for a successor to style himself identically to the person he is succeeding. There were two Pope Benedict XIVs, one a pope and one an antipope, but I'm not buying the story about Carrier...
Ansat (talk) 04:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is highly irregular for an article to cover two different people just because they happen to share the same name. We need to devise disambiguated titles for two articles and separate each person into one article. Elizium23 (talk) 07:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We could use their baptismal names as disambiguation: