Talk:Economic bubble

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Economic bubble article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

Economics High‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cryptocurrencies

Cryptocurrencies prices are growing fast, but this is not a prove to categorize it as a bubble. NASDAQ 2010-2017 is much higher and it's easy to find media articles talking about the "dot com 2.0 bubble", but we cannot categorize it as a bubble until it crashes. So please, do not include Cryptocurrencies as a bubble until we go through a Blow off phase. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.37.187.155 (talk) 10:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is not how words work - David Gerard (talk) 22:33, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another point of view

To me and John Authers in the Financial Times, The Long View of 9 dec 17, we are in the opinion there was a bubble with the bitcoins at the end of 2013 when it gained 5,500 per cent to about $1,100 before it came back to around $200 in 2015. John Authers also think the bitcoin is currently in the bubble area with the price having increased fivefold in the first 11 months of this year and 70 per cent in the past week. Saindon (talk) 19:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with that. Moreover, the 2013 slide in value was also described as a bubble.--DreamLinker (talk) 04:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GameStop

Would it be appropriate to include the GME shortsqueeze into the list of examples? It's newsworthy and caused a large number of people to suffer catastrophic losses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.242.156 (talk) 04:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]