User talk:MostConducive

I'm guessing you are mostconducive on LJ. Welcome! I hope you have a long, productive stay.

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be Bold! BTW, I marked several of your contributions (such as Polycontexturality) with the {{Move to Wiktionary}} tag because they are Dictionary Definitions at the present time. Feel free to remove the notices if you improve them, but please cite your sources, as Wikipedia is not the place for original research (c.f Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not).

Thanks again for your contributions. --Silas Snider (talk) 18:26, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

Paradigmeter

Your artice Paradigmeter is up for deletion here. You may want to check it out. --Silas Snider (talk) 03:45, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)

Subjectivity

Your edits to subjectivity look like buzzword-generator jokes. They are incomprehensible. At best they are EXTREMELY P.O.V. Michael Hardy 21:19, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Proemial relation

The article Proemial relation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No results for "Proemial relation" on JSTOR, fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - car chasm (talk) 05:59, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]