User talk:Nufy8

This user may have left Wikipedia. Nufy8 has not edited Wikipedia since May of 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Wiki Wars Episode IV: A GNU Hope Whether you're bored, high, or just a huge nerd, this is the subpage for you!

Note: I will remove comments that contain personal attacks, gross incivility, threats, trolling, or vandalism. Constructive criticism is welcome; being a dick is not.

Archives

December '04 – September '05
October '05 – April '06
May '06 – November '06
December '06 – August '07
September '07 – March '08

JoshuaGrant36

I'd like to inform you that User:JoshuaGrant36 is probably User:JoshuaGrant who is actually User:TheKittenBoy who also has an affinity for Tom and Jerry related edits. 128.227.87.100 (talk) 01:54, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Might also want to check out Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_TheKittenBoy. 36 is the next one numerically. 128.227.87.100 (talk) 01:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kir Kanos

I have nominated Kir Kanos, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kir Kanos. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 03:14, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kirkanos.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kirkanos.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Virgin Killer

Thanks for actioning the RFP on this article. However, the version now protected contains the altered version of the album cover. Whether this cover should be altered or not is currently being discussed in an RFC. Until consensus is reached, the version of the page from before this edit-war should be retained. Until 8th May, the cover was the original one. The most recent revert, before protection, with the cover before the controversy is http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Virgin_Killer&oldid=211303267. As I understand policy, the image used should not change until a consensus is reached, or a decision made in another manner (e.g. legal action). Therefore, is it possible for you to restore the page to one showing the 'original' cover? Otherwise those trying to subvert the process of discussion by repeatedly changing the image used will have 'won. Thanks again, -- Chzz ► 18:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I apologise for reverting the image earlier. I understand fully why it's silly to get involved in 'revison wars'. At the time, I foolishly didn't understand that it had been changed back and forth so many times. As soon as I realised that the correct action would be a RFP, I found the correct place, and then saw that an RFP haad already been created by another user. I

then thanked him.

Thank you for taking the time to explain your thoughts on my talk page. I will consider your viewpoint and do some reading up. I believe that, whilst a matter is under discussiong, locking the page in any amended form is unfair, and the only fair policy would be to leave the original until the dispute is resolved. I will try to verify this by studying policy.

-- Chzz ► 19:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Second apology. Having read WP:PREFER I now see that the actions you took were totally correct according to current policy. I also see there is some debate over this policy;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Protection_policy#Protecting_the_current_version_rewards_revert_warriors

I'll put my comments in there.

-- Chzz ► 19:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll echo Chzz's thanks for stoping the dumb revert war. Jclemens (talk) 20:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Nufy8 (talk) 22:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With the greatest of respect, and without wishing to 'involve' you in the debate - I quite understand an admin must retain absolute neutrality, however; I feel obliged to raise the point that, in this specific case, I feel the protected page should be amended to have the picture as it was before this whole debate began, for the following reasons;

Whilst the various debates take place, over however many days, people who read about this will look on wikipedia and see that action has been taken. This suggests to the 'outside world' that wikipedia has not followed their own policies and procedures regarding decisions
If the revert does not take place in the near future, then whenever protection is removed a user (such as myself) might quite legitimately revert the image order, because no concensus was reached to amend it. That action is likely to provoke a further unconstructive edit war. If the page is protected again, or if protection is extended for a longer period, this will just emphasise the effect described in my first point.

I hope I have presented myself clearly, and that you won't think I'm being obtuse over the issue. I am well aware of the debates going on elsewhere, but this specific point is separate from those. Apologies for taking your time over this, but I do think an important precedent exists.-- Chzz ► 22:29, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Virgin Killer - anti-policy

On my talk page, you said, "I'd rather err on the side of caution unless it's something blatantly anti-policy."

I requested an editprotected, to revert the 'dreaded' cover to the top of the page. Aside from all other issues, this was a reasonable request, because consensus had already established.

An admin refused the request.

That is 'blatantly anti-policy'.

Please perform the requested edit.

-- Chzz ► 05:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tfclogo.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tfclogo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of D'Sparil

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article D'Sparil, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Arcturustheshammirrors.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arcturustheshammirrors.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Briatharenfull.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Briatharenfull.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warren OG Harding

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

Looks like you're the original gangsta:

[1][2][3][4][5][6]

--Selket ^Talk 05:54, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even when he's dead Harding can't catch a break. Thanks. Nufy8 (talk) 13:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning?

As far as I know, I was using his website as a reference. I did not mean it to be promotional. 65.43.22.134 (talk) 02:09, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, look at this from my point of view: an anonymous user with no edit history sneaks in a few links to a non-notable kid's website, and what do you know, that user happens to have the same ISP, be in the same basic IP range, and reside in the same location as the website's registrant. Add in the fact that there have been multiple instances of disruption related to this kid and his website on Wikipedia (and now that I look over the deletion log, Wikinews as well), and you may begin to understand why I doubt that assertion. Nufy8 (talk) 02:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO

Dear Nufy8 I'm a Italian boy, can I help to translate English texts in Italian texts? Write me!!!!!!!!!!!--Paperone94 (talk) 12:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you're talking about translating English articles into Italian for the Italian Wikipedia, then go for it. If you're looking for help with the translation, then I'm afraid I won't be too useful since I don't know Italian. Nufy8 (talk) 15:28, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

confused?

The information I removed was origally put there by me and is inncorect. Does it need to be discussed before it's removed?Todg (talk) 19:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hey Nufy, are you still mad? I been thinking of you. I was wondering if you could unblock me for a little bit and maybe we could talk? Please let me know, man. --Xander756 (talk) 17:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jason, I was wondering if you could just unblock me for like five minutes. Please, man? --Xander756 (talk) 17:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ulicqeldromaold.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Ulicqeldromaold.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 20:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ulicandnomi.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Ulicandnomi.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 20:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ulicqeldromaversuscay.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Ulicqeldromaversuscay.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 20:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAR

Letting you know I've put Half-Life 2 up for Featured article review here. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 02:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Half-Life 2 has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:59, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Call of Duty: WaW Beta

Hey did you get into the beta of WaW? If not I got it and if you wanted to come over and try it out that would be cool. --Xander756 (talk) 17:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creefer

I'd like to inform you that the articles I fixed on the articles of: Canton, OH, Canton, GA, Canton, KS, Canton SD, and Canton, TX; are all correct. It was Barrack Obama, not John McCain that visited Canton, OH. My references are the Colbert Report and a few links from google to make sure. I am new to editing so I don't know to the Wiki Rules of Referencing. The only Wiki Rule I know is to "Ignore all rules" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Creefer (talk • contribs) 05:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Exchange (crime syndicate)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Exchange (crime syndicate), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --EEMIV (talk) 01:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Exchange (crime syndicate)

I have nominated The Exchange (crime syndicate), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Exchange (crime syndicate) (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. --EEMIV (talk) 18:15, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ping

I have sent you an e-mail. --Tenmei (talk) 16:12, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FAR

I have nominated Half-Life 2 for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.--Vaypertrail (talk) 15:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You sure about that?

Mission: Impossible (film series)#Mission: Impossible IV HalfShadow 03:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake; read that as fourth film. HalfShadow 03:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Hballv1.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hballv1.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:39, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Lee Jones

Hey, just wanted to let you know I listed that article at RFP before I'd noticed you'd protected it. Umbralcorax (talk) 04:51, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like User:Hazard-SJ completed the request. Nufy8 (talk) 05:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 17:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WilliamH (talk) 01:57, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Tobinbellrevelations.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tobinbellrevelations.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:18, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Zakandgia.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Zakandgia.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]