Talk:Glacier Peak
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glacier Peak article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Glacier Peak has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Images
[edit]This article could use more images for GA. Black Tusk (talk) 22:57, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- √, I think. Ceran→→ 23:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Probable error in the Geology section.
[edit]The ‘Geology’ section states, “In the Dusty Creek, located by the mountain, there is a lahar at least 6 km (3.7 mi) thick“.
That is nearly 20,000 feet, which makes no sense. Could it be referring to the width?73.164.63.46 (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have reviewed the source and corrected the value. —¿philoserf? (talk) 15:57, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Geography and places good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Geography
- GA-Class vital articles in Geography
- GA-Class WikiProject Volcanoes articles
- High-importance WikiProject Volcanoes articles
- All WikiProject Volcanoes pages
- GA-Class Mountain articles
- Mid-importance Mountain articles
- All WikiProject Mountains pages
- GA-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- GA-Class Washington articles
- Mid-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- WikiProject United States articles