Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serafitia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 03:19, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
Hoax, original research, insult page, trollery, take your pick. Google test shows no use of the term in the way the author claims; the nick "Serafitia" is in use on various forums, however; suspect insult page. Unverified and IMO unverifiable. Delete. JRM 00:31, 2005 Jan 19 (UTC)
- Delete-Clipdude 01:19, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete certainly interesting, and I suspect true in many cases as well, but an encyclopedia just isn't the place for it. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:23, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree, it looks like an insult page, or at the very least, a neologism. foobaz·✐ 02:28, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- An overblown analysis of some Web term or nickname or whatever. Wikipedia is not a Web guide. Delete. --Slowking Man 02:29, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, My head hurts. Inter 11:57, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete silliness. There may be an article hiding in some of this on a more general topic, and I would welcome it, but this looks like an attack on an individual. -- Jmabel | Talk 21:57, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Jayjg | (Talk) 22:35, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Rhobite 05:52, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Mikkalai 07:39, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Obviously an insult page, as links given at the bottom go to forum threads insulting someone of the same name. Redbox86
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.