Reciprocals of primes
The reciprocals of prime numbers have been of interest to mathematicians for various reasons. They do not have a finite sum, as Leonhard Euler proved in 1737.
Like rational numbers, the reciprocals of primes have repeating decimal representations. In his later years, George Salmon (1819–1904) concerned himself with the repeating periods of these decimal representations of reciprocals of primes.[1]
Contemporaneously, William Shanks (1812–1882) calculated numerous reciprocals of primes and their repeating periods, and published two papers "On Periods in the Reciprocals of Primes" in 1873[2] and 1874.[3] In 1874 he also published a table of primes, and the periods of their reciprocals, up to 20,000 (with help from and "communicated by the Rev. George Salmon"), and pointed out the errors in previous tables by three other authors.[4]
Rules for calculating the periods of repeating decimals from rational fractions were given by James Whitbread Lee Glaisher in 1878.[5] For a prime p, the period of its reciprocal divides p − 1.[6]
The sequence of recurrence periods of the reciprocal primes (sequence A002371 in the OEIS) appears in the 1973 Handbook of Integer Sequences.
List of reciprocals of primes
[edit]Prime (p) |
Period length |
Reciprocal (1/p) |
---|---|---|
2 | 0 | 0.5 |
3 | † 1 | 0.3 |
5 | 0 | 0.2 |
7 | * 6 | 0.142857 |
11 | † 2 | 0.09 |
13 | 6 | 0.076923 |
17 | * 16 | 0.0588235294117647 |
19 | * 18 | 0.052631578947368421 |
23 | * 22 | 0.0434782608695652173913 |
29 | * 28 | 0.0344827586206896551724137931 |
31 | 15 | 0.032258064516129 |
37 | † 3 | 0.027 |
41 | 5 | 0.02439 |
43 | 21 | 0.023255813953488372093 |
47 | * 46 | 0.0212765957446808510638297872340425531914893617 |
53 | 13 | 0.0188679245283 |
59 | * 58 | 0.0169491525423728813559322033898305084745762711864406779661 |
61 | * 60 | 0.016393442622950819672131147540983606557377049180327868852459 |
67 | 33 | 0.014925373134328358208955223880597 |
71 | 35 | 0.01408450704225352112676056338028169 |
73 | 8 | 0.01369863 |
79 | 13 | 0.0126582278481 |
83 | 41 | 0.01204819277108433734939759036144578313253 |
89 | 44 | 0.01123595505617977528089887640449438202247191 |
97 | * 96 | 0.010309278350515463917525773195876288659793814432989690721649484536082474226804123711340206185567 |
101 | † 4 | 0.0099 |
103 | 34 | 0.0097087378640776699029126213592233 |
107 | 53 | 0.00934579439252336448598130841121495327102803738317757 |
109 | * 108 | 0.009174311926605504587155963302752293577981651376146788990825688073394495412844036697247706422018348623853211 |
113 | * 112 | 0.0088495575221238938053097345132743362831858407079646017699115044247787610619469026548672566371681415929203539823 |
127 | 42 | 0.007874015748031496062992125984251968503937 |
* Full reptend primes are italicised.
† Unique primes are highlighted.
Full reptend primes
[edit]A full reptend prime, full repetend prime, proper prime[7]: 166 or long prime in base b is an odd prime number p such that the Fermat quotient
(where p does not divide b) gives a cyclic number with p − 1 digits. Therefore, the base b expansion of repeats the digits of the corresponding cyclic number infinitely.
Unique primes
[edit]A prime p (where p ≠ 2, 5 when working in base 10) is called unique if there is no other prime q such that the period length of the decimal expansion of its reciprocal, 1/p, is equal to the period length of the reciprocal of q, 1/q.[8] For example, 3 is the only prime with period 1, 11 is the only prime with period 2, 37 is the only prime with period 3, 101 is the only prime with period 4, so they are unique primes. The next larger unique prime is 9091 with period 10, though the next larger period is 9 (its prime being 333667). Unique primes were described by Samuel Yates in 1980.[9] A prime number p is unique if and only if there exists an n such that
is a power of p, where denotes the th cyclotomic polynomial evaluated at . The value of n is then the period of the decimal expansion of 1/p.[10]
At present, more than fifty decimal unique primes or probable primes are known. However, there are only twenty-three unique primes below 10100.
The decimal unique primes are
References
[edit]- ^ "Obituary Notices – George Salmon". Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society. Second Series. 1: xxii–xxviii. 1904. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
...there was one branch of calculation which had a great fascination for him. It was the determination of the number of figures in the recurring periods in the reciprocals of prime numbers.
- ^ Shanks, William (1873). "On Periods in the Reciprocals of Primes". The Messenger of Mathematics. II: 41–43. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
- ^ Shanks, William (1874). "On Periods in the Reciprocals of Primes". The Messenger of Mathematics. III: 52–55. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
- ^ Shanks, William (1874). "On the Number of Figures in the Period of the Reciprocal of Every Prime Number Below 20,000". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 22: 200–210. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
- ^ Glaisher, J. W. L. (1878). "On circulating decimals with special reference to Henry Goodwin's 'Table of circles' and 'Tabular series of decimal quotients'". Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society: Mathematical and physical sciences. 3 (V): 185–206. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
- ^ Cook, John D. "Reciprocals of primes". johndcook.com. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
- ^ Dickson, Leonard E., 1952, History of the Theory of Numbers, Volume 1, Chelsea Public. Co.
- ^ Caldwell, Chris. "Unique prime". The Prime Pages. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
- ^ Yates, Samuel (1980). "Periods of unique primes". Math. Mag. 53: 314. Zbl 0445.10009.
- ^ "Generalized Unique". Prime Pages. Retrieved 9 December 2023.
External links
[edit]- Parker, Matt (March 14, 2022). "The Reciprocals of Primes - Numberphile". YouTube.