Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Liberation Front Of Tibet

I think I may receive death threats for putting this on VFD, but it seems like an armed extermists propaganda to me. =P - Mailer Diablo 12:13, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Don't feed the trolls -- too late: [1] -- Chris 73 Talk
Delete, maybe even speedy. Google shows ONE hit for "United Liberation Front Of Tibet", and that is a comment in a public forum with the same text as the article for deletion. -- Chris 73 Talk 12:14, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. It would be good if there were a way to get rid of these faster. --BM 13:41, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Not a recognized group. --LeeHunter 16:26, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Not listed in List of active autonomist and secessionist movements or List of historical autonomist and secessionist movements. No useful content at present. If verifiable content is added (and I'd recommend the article be stubified as the first step) I'll change my vote. Meanwhile please send any explosives by email only (you do it by attaching it to your computer with the email client running and lighting the fuse.) Andrewa 17:44, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete, probably not notable and not a useful basis for an article anyway. --fvw * 19:56, 2004 Dec 27 (UTC)
Delete, agreed that patent political tracts such as this should be speedies. They may become notable later, so an article can always be started again. nn, ad. Wyss 21:56, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- It's an ad, Wyss? :P Delete as... revolutioncruft? hfool 23:04, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Heh heh. Politcal ad, sure (I'd consider propaganda a subset of that etc). Which is to say... wiki is not a soapbox. Wyss 03:39, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Delete. Even if an article could be written on this group, there is little or no useful information to start from here. Revolutioncruft is as good a term as any. Tuf-Kat 23:07, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
Comment. Hah! "Revolutioncruft", is it? Such comments will ensure you're the first against the wall when the revolution does come! (And have you noticed that you can join up by mailing the address at the bottom? Let the good times roll for the rebels, I say.) JRM 00:22, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)
Delete. Worthless trash, no corroboration or proof that this group exists. Lankiveil 12:52, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC) (oops, wikinews != wikipedia)