User talk:Steerpike

Add a new heading below to discuss any of my edits you like.

Nero, Tiberius and Caligula

Thanks for the encouragement on Nero. I really appreciate it.

I have no clue what happened to the original Nero image. It just vanished. I guess that Bill Oaf character scared wiki into taking it down. I suppose it could be argued that the first scetch of the graffiti was an original form of art, though not very original if you ask me (copying from stone to paper). I decided to go around it and just do the scetch myself. Problem solved.

I've tried at different times to aid the Caligula article, but its a harder one to manage. Its gets more traffic and gets edited more. Its easier to research though. There are really only three short sources on Caligula (Philo, Josephus and Suetonius) and he only reigned 4 years. I'll try to help out with it and Tiberius (who I know nothing about yet, but would like to)

With Nero, I realized the only way to get the article to stop changing was to source every line and check on it every few days. You really have to own it. After 2000 years, people are still emotionally charged about him which makes him so interesting.

Thanks.Hoshidoshi 04:13, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tiberius is an interesting character; a lot more complex than I previously thought. Unfortunately the current article is a bit one-sided, mostly emphasizing the reasons for his unpopularity and mentioning little of his policies. To be fair, nearly half of his reign was spent in withdrawal on Capri, but I still think the article does not mention much of his Eastern policies, his diplomacy, his religious policy, etc... especially given the massive coverage provided by Tacitus. Caligula is a bit more straightforward, as you say. His reign was brief and the sources on it are limited. It's a real shame we lost Tacitus' account of this period, although it probably wasn't very positive, given the few foreshadowing comments in his text on Tiberius.

When I started editing, the article in Caligula was actually in better shape than the one on Tiberius. I haven't noticed much vandalising btw, but maybe that's because I'm primarily used to watching over video game articles and they get littered with inane comments *all the time*. I'll probably restricit myself to providing citations for the time being. After that, I'll try and expand the article on Tiberius. --Steerpike 13:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Space music

Hi. It seems like you have an interest in ambient music. I wonder if you wouldn't mind taking a look at Space music when you get a chance. There is currently an ongoing issue there with one editor trying to suggest that space music is not a genre of ambient - and the discussion would certainly benefit from outside opinions by knowledgeable parties. --Gene_poole 07:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic the Hedgehog (8-bit)

Why do you think that the 8-bit version of Sonic the Hedgehog is warranting an article? It's more or less the same game. - A Link to the Past (talk) 03:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well maybe it doesn't. I checked on that article and saw it had been changed into a redirect so I thought it was vandalism of some sort. Sorry! --Steerpike 10:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Titus

Thanks for asking me to look at the Titus article. Your expansions look excellent; the article reads well, I think all the important material is now covered, and your references to the ancient sources will be very useful for readers who want to follow the info up. The only possible factual issues are with some of the material that was present before your edits; for example, some of the dates for Titus' early career are conjectural. I'll see what I can do about finding sources for these points and the ones you mention on Talk (the Jones-Milns commentary on Suetonius has proven quite handy in looking over the first couple of paragraphs). With a few extra sources the article should easily meet the good article standards. Nice work. :) EALacey 17:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bad links in Elagabalus

Someone wrote me that bad links were being added to this article, and thought that my transcription of Books 79 and 80 might be at fault; I've just taken a look, and the links are bad, all right, but because they're being inserted without looking at the sourcecode of those pages. For example "LXXX.16" is not as inserted, but #79-16.7 — If you feel that direct links to Dio are useful in this article, you need to check they're right.... Best, Bill 11:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the one who emailed you about that, actually :) I was planning to fix this today. Thanks for your reply! You're right I should have looked at the sourcecode, which you mention in your introduction to Dio's Roman History, so sorry for bothering you about it. I browsed through all your FAQs before sending my email but forgot to check the most important page :) Cheers. --Steerpike 11:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that wuz you; makes sense! And I in turn have some filling in of links to do (in other Books of Dio), as I mentioned in our e-mails, now that it's clear they're of use. Best, Bill 11:31, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 12 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Elagabalium, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--DarkFalls ^talk 07:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steerpike

Nice work on Augustus, dude. Really though, good job, great picture, more coherent sub-section headings, all around more polished because of your efforts and that of wiki member Laura Scudder. Thanks for replying on the talk page too, I too would like to see all of the Roman Emperors (and some important statesmen and generals) lifted to at least GA status. I think that will be my next project as well. I see from your user page that you have made some significant contributions to several articles.

Also, I'm glad you liked the Song Dynasty articles, it was a lot of work creating the six related sub-articles: History, Culture, Society, Economy, Technology, and Architecture.

Lot's of work, but it looks beautifully done. That's how I want Augustus' article to look!

Take care.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 13:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sejanus GA on hold

GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. Nehrams2020 21:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Praetorian Guard

It's done, with appropriate citations. Thanks for bringing that to attention.--Pericles of Athens^Talk 20:29, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Titus

Nice work on getting this to GA status. I hope you make a push for FA before too long. :) --mav 18:46, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It's one of my prouder articles on Wikipedia :). Still needs some tweaking before I'd take it to FA though. --Steerpike 21:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article looks to me like it could go to FAC. Is there any content missing? Do you need a hand for this? Nergaal (talk) 16:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The main problem with this article at the moment is that it references ancient (primary) sources almost exclusively. This almost guarantees a quick-fail during the FAC review process. The content should be re-written from the point of view of modern academic (secondary) literature. Unfortunately, the only major biographical work concerning Titus (The Emperor Titus, Brian Jones) has gone out of print. --Steerpike (talk) 17:36, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Berenice of Cilicia

The article Berenice of Cilicia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Berenice of Cilicia for things needed to be addressed. T Rex | talk 02:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations it has passed. T Rex | talk 03:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article importance scale for WikiProject Equine

Hello. WikiProject Equine is discussing an article importance scale here. Your POV would be appreciated. --Una Smith (talk) 18:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Tomb Raider

I should've put an explanation on the talkpage when I added the template. That was my mistake. Anyway, there are too many images in the article, most of which are unimportant; we don't need pictures of "key items" or multiple locations Lara encounters in her travels, and the "Unfinished Business" image is exactly the same as the original box art. Just the original box art and a couple screenshots are needed. There was a similar problem of a glut of copyrighted images on some of the Harry Potter character pages, which we solved by simply removing some of them and leaving a couple older ones. Beemer 69 23:46, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm just going to copy-paste this to the relevant section on the Tomb Raider talkpage. We'll continue from there, so others can join in. --Steerpike (talk) 14:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bust of Domitian

Just in case nobody can make it up to the museum, the TMA has the following on their website:

For Images, Rights Permission, and Licensing
Please send a written request to:

Rights and Reproductions
Toledo Museum of Art
P.O. Box 1013
Toledo, Ohio 43697
or fax to 419-254-5089
No e-mail requests will be processed.

They may be able to send you some great images that Wikipedia can use. Since I can see international mail being a bit expensive I would be happy to send a letter for you; if you provide me with a .doc of what to send. Hope that helps! §hep • ¡Talk to me! 20:32, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! For now, we can just wait and see if any Wikipedians come up with pictures. If nothing turns up, we could consider writing the museum. It's quite possible of course they deny free use of official photographs. Cheers. --Steerpike (talk) 21:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Steerpike. In short, I will extend this article. Jaime85.

I'm so sorry I'm just replying now! You sent me a message about sending a letter to the museum over the summer. It happened while I was recovering from getting nussed and it got archived without me seeing it. I subscribed to the indexer bot and it came straight to my attention. So here I am! Now that that's out of the way. Did you have anything in particular you'd like the letter to say? Sorry again, §hep • ¡Talk to me! 00:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, not your fault. Might not be worth the trouble writing the museum though. They'd have to be willing to donate free pictures, which they probably won't. It would be less of a hassle of someone just went there and took the picture him/herself. But right now, it's not really urgent for me anymore (if it ever was). I still think it's an amazing statue (the most beautiful of this emperor to have survived), but right now the article has plenty of pictures. So, don't feel hard-pressed to write the letter. Cheers. --Steerpike (talk) 11:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The music section

When you say Reasons for deletion? (at the Tomb Raider article). What are you refering to? --Tulok (talk) 17:04, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That comment was related to another edit, made by an anonymous user. But regarding the music section: there really isn't thát much worth mentioning, at least not much that can be properly sourced as far as I know. So I don't think it really deserves a prominent place in the article. I did wonder why you deleted the composer information though? --Steerpike (talk) 18:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tigidius Perennis

Regarding this diff - nothing's wrong with them, if you say they're okay. The edit was made by an abusive sockpuppet with no constructive contribs from any of his many accounts (aside from this edit, apparently) so I reverted them to be on the safe side. If you vouch for the content and sources, it's fine by me. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department} 07:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Domitian

Agreed. Excuse me my brevity, but I translate English better than what I speak or write. When we finish these two articles, there will be two new FAs ;). Regards. Jaime —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.7.172.111 (talk) 00:28, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work in article Domitian --Rjecina (talk) 23:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Domitian (FA)

Congrats! Ealdgyth - Talk 01:37, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear God! You rock. I will have to read this article in its entirety. Manhattan Samurai (talk) 06:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That was sudden, actually. I don't think it's quite perfect yet, so I'll probably keep tweaking :) --Steerpike (talk) 11:26, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --17:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous edits in Roman articles

A question was asked at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome about articles edited recently by Special:Contributions/24.18.119.54. I glanced through Lucius Seius Strabo. My opinion (reached very hastily) is that all the changes were (certainly or probably) improvements. The anonymous contributor

removed the alternative name Lucius Aelius Strabo, which was a mistake made by someone who doesn't understand Roman names;
removed some irrelevant material that belonged in other articles;
improved the phraseology, and, more important,
made it clearer what are facts and what are uncertain deductions.

All these changes were good. I think the contributor's fault is not to have realised that it's better to have an account, and better to explain major changes on talk pages. You reverted the article -- and I can see why you did! -- but I think, in this case, it would be much better to accept the changes. Andrew Dalby 18:22, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree :) --Steerpike (talk) 20:46, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[At the same moment you wrote that, I wrote:] I see now I was writing to the editor who largely wrote the article. Sorry for not realising that. I still think the anonymous changes were largely improvements -- but, since you have written so much on Roman history, I recognise that you may well have had good reason to think otherwise! Andrew Dalby 20:49, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Domitian again

That's a very impressive article. My envious regards to you! Haploidavey (talk) 02:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Steerpike (talk) 12:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Diurpanaeus, Decebalus.

Hello, browsing through Trajan's biography by Julian Bennett, I read that the Dacian king Diurpanaeus abdicated in favour of Decebalus after defeating Domitian; the Wikipedia entries on Domitian, Trajan and Decebalus, however, all sustain that Diurpanaeus & Decebalus were the same person, and that "Decebalus" was a title, meaning "the brave one". As this is not the sole instance of possible doubles/doublets in Ancient History, how do you think this should be mentioned? ThanksCerme (talk) 16:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've checked with my volume of "The Emperor Domitian" by Brian Jones, and it does appear that Diurpaneus and Decebalus were two distinct persons. In a footnote, Jones further comments that Diurpaneus (or Dorpaneus) may be another name for Duras, who actually preceded Decebalus as king of Dacia. I will investigate the issue further and see how the information can be incorporated into the articles. Regards. --Steerpike (talk) 17:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Septimius Severus

Hello! On first sight, I think you did a nice job. Birley is a very good scholar for biographies, although he, imho, sometimes overdoes it with his conjectures. As for the section for Religious persecution, it needs improvement (it's entirely based on primary christian sources). I know it is not yours but, perhaps, you can improve it since you own the Birley's book (I don't). Regards.--Dipa1965 (talk) 18:17, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I actually meant to expand the article to three or four times its current size but I abandoned the project when I was about halfway through Severus' early career. I'm sort of busy with college related stuff right now, but it's certainly a project I plan on returning to in the near future. Beyond that though, I have to admit that I plain don't like Septimius Severus all that much. The subject didn't turn out to be as interesting as I thought it would be. Apart from his provincial origins, he's actually one of the less fascinating emperors in the history of the Roman Empire (for me at least). Regards. --Steerpike (talk) 21:59, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Map error?

Please see the recent comment at Talk:Year of the Four Emperors. The map is titled 69, but seems to include Vespasian's additions to the empire, which of course mostly postdate 69. --Dweller (talk) 13:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore me. I've misread the map, as had the original poster. I'll respond. --Dweller (talk) 14:03, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sonic CD Title.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Sonic CD Title.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 06:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tails Skypatrol Title.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tails Skypatrol Title.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:06, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tomb Raider Natla.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tomb Raider Natla.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:50, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Knuckleschaotix titlescreen.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Knuckleschaotix titlescreen.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:50, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sonic Spinball Titlescreen.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sonic Spinball Titlescreen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:44, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tomb Raider St Francis Folly.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tomb Raider St Francis Folly.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:49, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tomb Raider Items.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tomb Raider Items.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:51, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sonic2 HiddenPalace.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sonic2 HiddenPalace.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:24, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Knuckles Chaotix Marina.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Knuckles Chaotix Marina.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:02, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tomb Raider 1 Box.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tomb Raider 1 Box.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:00, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Something from 2006

This is way back in your editing history but you may still wish to take an interest in it. File:Crash Dummies Working.png and File:Crash Dummies Junkbots.png have flawed licenses, both were uploaded under fairuse criteria, and after a suggestion on the talk page the copyright was modified to say they were freely useable here. However these images are derivative works, and two copyrights are at play, that of the photographer and that of the creator of the subject of the image, the photographer is free to release the rights to his image but has no right to release that of the subject. Although policies at Commons and wikipedia differ, reading Commons:Derivative works may help. Some one has to decide if these images are still vital to the article and construct a fair use criteria to keep them.--KTo288 (talk) 19:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have absolutely no attachment to those pictures (sentimental or otherwise), so if you want them removed be my guest. Regards. --Steerpike (talk) 21:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Crash Dummies Working.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Crash Dummies Working.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. KTo288 (talk) 20:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Crash Dummies Junkbots.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Crash Dummies Junkbots.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. KTo288 (talk) 20:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:ROTR Loader Defeated.png)

Thanks for uploading File:ROTR Loader Defeated.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:ROTR Supervisor.png)

Thanks for uploading File:ROTR Supervisor.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dolly zoom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Quick and the Dead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for permission

Hello. I would like to use your useful image File:Flavian_family_tree.png to illustrate a book I am writing. It would be inside a chapter, about 1/2 page in size. The book is commercial (though it is scholarly and therefore not likely to sell a lot of copies). May I have your permission to use it for this purpose? What name should I use for the "creator" of the image? Thank you very much. Sofia Roberts (talk) 02:09, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I don't think you actually need my permission to use the image since permission is automatically granted by the image's licence (but it's nice of you to ask). For attribution, you can use my real name (Ben Meuleman) instead of my Wikipedia user name. Alternatively, you could easily recreate the image in powerpoint on your own, since it's just a bunch of boxes linked up with lines. Then you'll have no licenses to worry about. Cheers. Steerpike (talk) 15:31, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate it. Now that I am looking at it closely, I think that there is an error. Quintus Petillius Cerialis was married to Vespasian's daughter, not Vespasian's sister (who according to the Wikipedia Vespasian article) died in infancy. I have looked and I don't see any reference to Cerialis having two marriages. Sofia Roberts (talk) 17:10, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Steerpike. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shinobi Legions Game.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shinobi Legions Game.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Gustav Doré Bluebeard.jpg

The file File:Gustav Doré Bluebeard.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sonic2 European Box.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sonic2 European Box.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shinobi Batman.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shinobi Batman.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sonic Spinball Box.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sonic Spinball Box.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:01, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]