Talk:Candy Suxxx

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Video games: Characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

This redirect is supported by the Video game characters task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Apr 28 to May 4 2004, consensus was (marginally) to keep. Discussion:

This is a completely irrelevant page and nothing links to there. Kieff 06:57, Apr 28, 2004 (UTC)

Keep only if drastically improved and linked. Else delete. Fennec 12:59, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Merge and redirect. She's a minor character in the game; a sentence or two in the Grand Theft Auto: Vice City article would cover just about everything there is to say. Everyking 16:49, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Agreed. In fact, Everyking and I were editing this debate at the same time and we both drew the same conclusion. My son has the game and I've dabbled in it enough to know how minor the character is. - Lucky 6.9 16:54, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Is her last name really lower cased? RickK 22:24, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I'm certain it isn't. Looks like the kind of typo that appears here quite often. - Lucky 6.9 22:33, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Delete. I don't think Western Civilization is in any danger of slipping into a neo-Dark Ages were we to remove this scap of information from wikipedia. Alcarillo 06:49, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Oh! It turns out she's a character from a video game series ultra-popular with Generation Y. The prostitute is a memorable character, from what I've read of the GTA games. Keep for the same reasons we have articles on Bowser Koopa or Diddy Kong. Wiwaxia 17:43, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- We don't have an article on Bowser Koopa. Diddy Kong is much more famous than this Candy character and has apppeared in many more games, even ones such as Diddy Kong Racing with his name in the title.--Lowellian 03:52, May 2, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Useless pseudoinformation. Wile E. Heresiarch 22:07, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Keep for reasons stated by Wiwaxia. Guanaco 00:45, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Marginal keep though needs moving to Candy Suxxx. -- Graham :) | Talk 15:02, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Marginal keep, maybe merge. I'd vote delete except that she was voiced by Jenna Jameson, which is an interesting piece of trivia. Oh, and if the article is kept and not merged, delete the stub note. This does NOT need expansion. Not all short articles are stubs. Isomorphic 19:57, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

End discussion