Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slashdot effect

Slashdot effect

Don't Delete it

• Keep. Is somebody declaring war on the Slashdot pages? LEAVE THEM ALONE. --Spe88 07:34, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Perhaps related to the Sollog issue? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 20:07, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
  • I'd say that was a sollogism. ;-) -- ChrisO 02:52, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, not even a valid candidate for VfD Wyss 01:07, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• It's pretty obvious that the vote will be "keep". Any chance of ending the discussion early? --Carnildo 01:08, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a no-brainer. --Sensor 01:58, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Pretty obvious really. -- ChrisO 02:52, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Another idiotic manipulation attempt by P.Ennis. Pakaran (ark a pan) 02:54, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. By the grace of Sollog, we will make the right decision......A2Kafir 03:20, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. doesn't make sense Ld 05:05, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. not a doubt about it. Mat334 05:27, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. --Arran4 05:31, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This was nominated by an anon, and has no votes in favour. Fond as I am of due process, this listing should be removed. DJ Clayworth 05:46, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Someone is currently blanking all /. subpages. But they seem very indecisive in first VfDing them, then labelling for merge and then changing to a redirect. Keep Estel (talk) 09:14, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)